Government by algorithm

Government by algorithm (also known as algorithmic regulation, regulation by algorithms, algorithmic governance, algocratic governance, algorithmic legal order or algocracy) is an alternative form of government or social ordering, where the usage of computer algorithms, especially of artificial intelligence and blockchain, is applied to regulations, law enforcement, and generally any aspect of everyday life such as transportation or land registration.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The term 'government by algorithm' appeared in academic literature as an alternative for 'algorithmic governance' in 2013.[10] A related term, algorithmic regulation is defined as setting the standard, monitoring and modification of behaviour by means of computational algorithms — automation of judiciary is in its scope.[11] In the context of blockchain, it is also known as blockchain governance.[12]

Not to be confused with Regulation of algorithms, E-government or Cyberocracy.
Part of a series on
Algocracy
Examples
Part of a series on
Governance
Models
By level
By field
Measures
Related topics

Government by algorithm raises new challenges that are not captured in the e-government literature and the practice of public administration.[13] Some sources equate cyberocracy, which is a hypothetical form of government that rules by the effective use of information,[14][15][16] with algorithmic governance, although algorithms are not the only means of processing information.[17][18] Nello Cristianini and Teresa Scantamburlo argued that the combination of a human society and certain regulation algorithms (such as reputation-based scoring) forms a social machine.[19]

History

In 1962, the director of the Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow (later Kharkevich Institute),[20] Alexander Kharkevich, published an article in the journal "Communist" about a computer network for processing information and control of the economy.[21][22] In fact, he proposed to make a network like the modern Internet for the needs of algorithmic governance. This created a serious concern among CIA analysts.[23] In particular, Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. warned that "by 1970 the USSR may have a radically new production technology, involving total enterprises or complexes of industries, managed by closed-loop, feedback control employing self-teaching computers".[23]

Between 1971 and 1973, the Chilean government carried out Project Cybersyn during the presidency of Salvador Allende. This project was aimed at constructing a distributed decision support system to improve the management of the national economy.[24][3]

Also in the 1960s and 1970s, Herbert A. Simon championed expert systems as tools for rationalization and evaluation of administrative behavior.[25] The automation of rule-based processes was an ambition of tax agencies over many decades resulting in varying success.[26] Early work from this period includes Thorne McCarty's influential TAXMAN project[27] in the US and Ronald Stamper's LEGOL project[28] in the UK. In 1993, the computer scientist Paul Cockshott from the University of Glasgow and the economist Allin Cottrell from the Wake Forest University published the book Towards a New Socialism, where they claim to demonstrate the possibility of a democratically planned economy built on modern computer technology.[29] The Honourable Justice Michael Kirby published a paper in 1998, where he expressed optimism that the then-available computer technologies such as legal expert system could evolve to computer systems, which will strongly affect the practice of courts.[30] In 2006, attorney Lawrence Lessig known for the slogan "Code is law" wrote:

"[T]he invisible hand of cyberspace is building an architecture that is quite the opposite of its architecture at its birth. This invisible hand, pushed by government and by commerce, is constructing an architecture that will perfect control and make highly efficient regulation possible"[31]

Since the 2000s, algorithms have been designed and used to automatically analyze surveillance videos.[32]

In his 2006's book Virtual Migration, A. Aneesh developed the concept of algocracy — information technologies constrain human participation in public decision making.[33][34] Aneesh differentiated algocratic systems from bureaucratic systems (legal-rational regulation) as well as market-based systems (price-based regulation).[35]

In 2013, algorithmic regulation was coined by Tim O'Reilly, founder and CEO of O'Reilly Media Inc.:

Sometimes the "rules" aren't really even rules. Gordon Bruce, the former CIO of the city of Honolulu, explained to me that when he entered government from the private sector and tried to make changes, he was told, "That's against the law." His reply was "OK. Show me the law." "Well, it isn't really a law. It's a regulation." "OK. Show me the regulation." "Well, it isn't really a regulation. It's a policy that was put in place by Mr. Somebody twenty years ago." "Great. We can change that!""

[...] Laws should specify goals, rights, outcomes, authorities, and limits. If specified broadly, those laws can stand the test of time. Regulations, which specify how to execute those laws in much more detail, should be regarded in much the same way that programmers regard their code and algorithms, that is, as a constantly updated toolset to achieve the outcomes specified in the laws. [...] It's time for government to enter the age of big data. Algorithmic regulation is an idea whose time has come.[36]

In 2017, Justice Ministry of Ukraine ran experimental government auctions using blockchain technology to ensure transparency and hinder corruption in governmental transactions.[37] "Government by Algorithm?" was the central theme introduced at Data for Policy 2017 conference held on 6-7 September 2017 in London, UK.[38]

Examples

Smart cities

A smart city is an urban area, where collected surveillance data is used to improve various operations in this area. Increase in computational power allows more automated decision making and replacement of public agencies by algorithmic governance.[39] In particular, the combined use of artificial intelligence and blockchains for IoT might lead to a creation of sustainable smart city ecosystems.[40] Intelligent street lighting in Glasgow is an example of benefits brought by government application of AI algorithms.[41]

The cryptocurrency millionaire, Jeffrey Berns, proposed to run local governments by tech firms in Nevada in 2021.[42] Mr. Berns bought 67,000 acres (271 km²) in Nevada's rural Storey County for $170,000,000 (£121,000,000) in 2018 in order to develop a smart city with more than 36,000 residents generating an annual output of $4,600,000,000.[42] Cryptocurrency will be allowed for payments.

Reputation systems
See also: Credit score

Tim O'Reilly suggested that data sources and reputation systems combined in algorithmic regulation can outperform traditional regulations.[36] For instance, once taxi-drivers are rated by passengers, the quality of their services will improve automatically and "drivers who provide poor service are eliminated".[36] O'Reilly's suggestion is based on control-theoreric concept of feed-back loop—improvements and disimprovements of reputation enforce desired behavior.[19] The usage of feed-loops for the management of social systems is already been suggested in management cybernetics by Stafford Beer before.[43]

These connections are explored by Nello Cristianini and Teresa Scantamburlo, where the reputation-credit scoring system is modeled as an incentive given to the citizens and computed by a social machine, so that rational agents would be motivated to increase their score by adapting their behaviour. Several ethical aspects of that technology are still being discussed.[19]

China's Social Credit System is closely related to China's mass surveillance systems such as the Skynet,[44][45][46] which incorporates facial recognition system, big data analysis technology and AI.[47][48][49][50] This system provides assessments of trustworthiness of individuals and businesses.[51][52][53] Among behavior, which is considered as misconduct by the system, jaywalking and failing to correctly sort personal waste are cited.[54][55][56][57][58] Behavior listed as positive factors of credit ratings includes donating blood, donating to charity, volunteering for community services, and so on.[59][60] Chinese Social Credit System enables punishments of "untrustworthy" citizens like denying purchase of tickets and rewards for "trustworthy" citizen like less waiting time in hospitals and government agencies.[61][62][63]

Smart contracts

Smart Contracts, cryptocurrencies, and Decentralized Autonomous Organization are mentioned as means to replace traditional ways of governance.[64][65][9] Cryptocurrencies are currencies, which are enabled by algorithms without a governmental central bank.[66] Central bank digital currency often employs similar technology, but is differentiated from the fact that it does use a central bank. It is soon to be employed by major unions and governments such as the European Union and China. Smart contracts are self-executable contracts, whose objectives are the reduction of need in trusted governmental intermediators, arbitrations and enforcement costs.[67][68] A decentralized autonomous organization is an organization represented by smart contracts that is transparent, controlled by shareholders and not influenced by a central government.[69][70][71] Smart contracts have been discussed for use in such applications as use in (temporary) employment contracts[72][73] and automatic transfership of funds and property (i.e. inheritance, upon registration of a death certificate).[74][75][76][77] Some countries such as Georgia and Sweden have already launched blockchain programs focusing on property (land titles and real estate ownership)[37][78][79][80] Ukraine is also looking at other areas too such as state registers.[37]

Algorithms in government agencies
See also: Artificial intelligence in government

According to a study of Stanford University, 45% of the studied US federal agencies have experimented with AI and related machine learning (ML) tools up to 2020.[6] US federal agencies counted the following number of artificial intelligence applications.[6]

Agency NameNumber of Use Cases
Office of Justice Programs12
Securities and Exchange Commission10
National Aeronautics and Space Administration9
Food and Drug Administration8
United States Geological Survey8
United States Postal Service8
Social Security Administration7
United States Patent and Trademark Office6
Bureau of Labor Statistics5
U.S. Customs and Border Protection4

53% of these applications were produced by in-house experts.[6] Commercial providers of residual applications include Palantir Technologies.[81]

From 2012, NOPD started a collaboration with Palantir Technologies in the field of predictive policing.[82] Besides Palantir's Gotham software, other similar (numerical analysis software) used by police agencies (such as the NCRIC) include SAS.[83]

In the fight against money laundering, FinCEN employs the FinCEN Artificial Intelligence System (FAIS).[84]

National health administration entities and organisations such as AHIMA (American Health Information Management Association) hold medical records. Medical records serve as the central repository for planning patient care and documenting communication among patient and health care provider and professionals contributing to the patient's care. In the EU, work is ongoing on a European Health Data Space which supports the use of health data.[85]

US Department of Homeland Security has employed the software ATLAS, which run on Amazon Cloud. It scanned more than 16.5 million of records of naturalized Americans and flagged approximately 124,000 of them for manual annalysis and review by USCIS officers regarding denaturalization.[86][87] There were flagged due to potential fraud, public safety and national security issues. Some of the scanned data came from Terrorist Screening Database and National Crime Information Center.

In Estonia, artificial intelligence is used in its e-government to make it more automated and seamless. A virtual assistant will guide citizens through any interactions they have with the government. Automated and proactive services "push" services to citizens at key events of their lives (including births, bereavements, unemployment, ...). One example is the automated registering of babies when they are born.[88] Estonia's X-Road system will also be rebuilt to include even more privacy control and accountability into the way the government uses citizen's data.[89]

In Costa Rica, the possible digitalization of public procurement activities (i.e. tenders for public works, ...) has been investigated. The paper discussing this possibility mentions that the use of ICT in procurement has several benefits such as increasing transparency, facilitating digital access to public tenders, reducing direct interaction between procurement officials and companies at moments of high integrity risk, increasing outreach and competition, and easier detection of irregularities.[90]

Besides using e-tenders for regular public works (construction of buildings, roads, ...), e-tenders can also be used for reforestation projects and other carbon sink restoration projects.[91] Carbon sink restoration projects may be part of the nationally determined contributions plans in order to reach the national Paris agreement goals

Government procurement audit software can also be used.[92][93] Audits are performed in some countries after subsidies have been received.

Some government agencies provide track and trace systems for services they offer. An example is track and trace for applications done by citizens (i.e. driving license procurement).[94]

Some government services use issue tracking system to keep track of ongoing issues.[95][96][97][98]

Justice by algorithm

Judges' decisions in Australia are supported by the "Split Up" software in case of determining the procentage of a split after a divorce.[99]

COMPAS software is used in USA to assess the risk of recidivism in courts.[100][101]

According to the statement of Beijing Internet Court, China is the first country to create an internet court or cyber court.[102][103][104] The Chinese AI judge is a virtual recreation of an actual female judge. She "will help the court's judges complete repetitive basic work, including litigation reception, thus enabling professional practitioners to focus better on their trial work".[102]

Also Estonia plans to employ artificial intelligence to decide small-claim cases of less than €7,000.[105]

Lawbots can perform tasks that are typically done by paralegals or young associates at law firms. One such technology used by US law firms to assist in legal research is from ROSS Intelligence,[106] and others vary in sophistication and dependence on scripted algorithms.[107] Another legal technology chatbot application is DoNotPay.

AI in education
Further information: Ofqual exam results algorithm

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, in-person final exams were impossible for thousands of students.[108] The public high school Westminster High employed algorithms to assign grades. UK's Department for Education also employed a statistical calculus to assign final grades in A-levels, due to the pandemic.[109]

Besides use in grading, software systems and AI are also optimizing coursework and are used in preparation for college entrance exams.[110]

AI teaching assistants are being developed and used for education (i.e. Georgia Tech's Jill Watson)[111][112] and there is also an ongoing debate on whether perhaps teachers can be entirely replaced by AI systems (i.e. in homeschooling).[113]

AI politicians
See also: Chatbot § Politics

In 2018, an activist named Michihito Matsuda ran for mayor in the Tama city area of Tokyo as a human proxy for an artificial intelligence program.[114] While election posters and campaign material used the term robot, and displayed stock images of a feminine android, the "AI mayor" was in fact a machine learning algorithm trained using Tama city datasets.[115] The project was backed by high-profile executives Tetsuzo Matsumoto of Softbank and Norio Murakami of Google.[116] Michihito Matsuda came third in the election, being defeated by Hiroyuki Abe.[117] Organisers claimed that the 'AI mayor' was programmed to analyze citizen petitions put forward to the city council in a more 'fair and balanced' way than human politicians.[118]

In 2019, AI-powered messenger chatbot SAM participated in the discussions on social media connected to an electoral race in New Zealand.[119] The creator of SAM, Nick Gerritsen, believes SAM will be advanced enough to run as a candidate by late 2020, when New Zealand has its next general election.[120]

Management of infection
See also: Digital contact tracing, Disease surveillance, and COVID-19 apps

In February 2020, China launched a mobile app to deal with the Coronavirus outbreak[121] called "close-contact-detector".[122] Users are asked to enter their name and ID number. The app is able to detect "close contact" using surveillance data (i.e. using public transport records, including trains and flights)[122] and therefore a potential risk of infection. Every user can also check the status of three other users. To make this inquiry users scan a Quick Response (QR) code on their smartphones using apps like Alipay or WeChat.[123] The close contact detector can be accessed via popular mobile apps including Alipay. If a potential risk is detected, the app not only recommends self-quarantine, it also alerts local health officials.[124]

Alipay also has the Alipay Health Code which is used to keep citizens safe. This system generates a QR code in one of three colors (green, yellow, or red) after users fill in a form on Alipay with personal details. A green code enables the holder to move around unrestricted. A yellow code requires the user to stay at home for seven days and red means a two-week quarantine. In some cities such as Hangzhou, it has become nearly impossible to get around without showing one's Alipay code.[125]

In Cannes, France, monitoring software has been used on footage shot by CCTV cameras, allowing to monitor their compliance to local social distancing and mask wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic. The system does not store identifying data, but rather allows to alert city authorities and police where breaches of the mask and mask wearing rules are spotted (allowing fining to be carried out where needed). The algorithms used by the monitoring software can be incorporated into existing surveillance systems in public spaces (hospitals, stations, airports, shopping centres, ...) [126]

Cellphone data is used to locate infected patients in South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and other countries.[127][128] In March 2020, the Israeli government enabled security agencies to track mobile phone data of people supposed to have coronavirus. The measure was taken to enforce quarantine and protect those who may come into contact with infected citizens.[129] Also in March 2020, Deutsche Telekom shared private cellphone data with the federal government agency, Robert Koch Institute, in order to research and prevent the spread of the virus.[130] Russia deployed facial recognition technology to detect quarantine breakers.[131] Italian regional health commissioner Giulio Gallera said that "40% of people are continuing to move around anyway", as he has been informed by mobile phone operators.[132] In USA, Europe and UK, Palantir Technologies is taken in charge to provide COVID-19 tracking services.[133]

Prevention and management of environmental disasters
See also: Early warning system

Tsunamis can be detected by Tsunami warning systems. They can make use of AI.[134][135] Floodings can also be detected using AI systems.[136] Locust breeding areas can be approximated using machine learning, which could help to stop locust swarms in an early phase.[137] Wildfires can be predicted using AI systems.[138][139] Also, wildfire detection is possible by AI systems (i.e. through satellite data, aerial imagery, and personnel position).[140][141][142] and they can also help in evacuation of people during wildfires.[143]

Reception

Benefits
See also: Techno-progressivism

Algorithmic regulation is supposed to be a system of governance where more exact data, collected from citizens via their smart devices and computers, is used to more efficiently organize human life as a collective.[144][145] As Deloitte estimated in 2017, automation of US government work could save 96.7 million federal hours annually, with a potential savings of $3.3 billion; at the high end, this rises to 1.2 billion hours and potential annual savings of $41.1 billion.[146]

Criticism

There are potential risks associated with the use of algorithms in government. Those include algorithms becoming susceptible to bias,[147] a lack of transparency in how an algorithm may make decisions,[148] and the accountability for any such decisions.[148]

There is also a serious concern that gaming by the regulated parties might occur, once more transparency is brought into the decision making by algorithmic governance, regulated parties might try to manipulate their outcome in own favor and even use adversarial machine learning.[6][19] According to Harari, the conflict between democracy and dictatorship is seen as a conflict of two different data-processing systems—AI and algorithms may swing the advantage toward the latter by processing enormous amounts of information centrally.[149]

In 2018, the Netherlands employed an algorithmic system SyRI (Systeem Risico Indicatie) to detect citizens perceived being high risk for committing welfare fraud, which quietly flagged thousands of people to investigators.[150] This caused a public protest. The district court of Hague shut down SyRI referencing Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).[151]

The contributors of the 2019 documentary iHuman expressed apprehension of "infinitely stable dictatorships" created by government AI.[152]

In 2020, algorithms assigning exam grades to students in the UK sparked open protest under the banner "Fuck the algorithm."[109] This protest was successful and the grades were taken back.[153]

In 2020, the US government software ATLAS, which run on Amazon Cloud, sparked uproar from activists and Amazon's own employees.[154]

In 2021, Eticas Foundation has launched a database of governmental algorithms called Observatory of Algorithms with Social Impact (OASI).[155]

Algorithmic bias and transparency
Main article: Algorithmic bias

An initial approach towards transparency included the open-sourcing of algorithms.[156] Software code can be looked into and improvements can be proposed through source-code-hosting facilities.

Public acceptance

A 2019 poll conducted by IE University's Center for the Governance of Change in Spain found that 25% of citizens from selected European countries were somewhat or totally in favor of letting an artificial intelligence make important decisions about how their country is run.[157] The following table lists the results by country:

CountryPercentage
France25%
Germany31%
Ireland29%
Italy28%
Netherlands43%
Portugal19%
Spain26%
UK31%

Researchers found some evidence that when citizens perceive their political leaders or security providers to be untrustworthy, disappointing, or immoral, they prefer to replace them by artificial agents, whom they consider to be more reliable.[158] The evidence is established by survey experiments on university students of all genders.

The novels Daemon and Freedom™ by Daniel Suarez describe a fictional scenario of global algorithmic regulation.[159]

See also

References
  1. Danaher, John (1 September 2016). "The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation". Philosophy & Technology. 29 (3): 245–268. doi:10.1007/s13347-015-0211-1. ISSN 2210-5441. S2CID 146674621. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  2. Yeung, Karen (December 2018). "Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation". Regulation & Governance. 12 (4): 505–523. doi:10.1111/rego.12158. S2CID 157086008.
  3. Medina, Eden (2015). "Rethinking algorithmic regulation" (PDF). Kybernetes. 44.6/7 (6/7): 1005–1019. doi:10.1108/K-02-2015-0052.
  4. Engin, Zeynep; Treleaven, Philip (March 2019). "Algorithmic Government: Automating Public Services and Supporting Civil Servants in using Data Science Technologies". The Computer Journal. 62 (3): 448–460. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxy082.
  5. Katzenbach, Christian; Ulbricht, Lena (29 November 2019). "Algorithmic governance". Internet Policy Review. 8 (4). doi:10.14763/2019.4.1424. hdl:10419/210652. ISSN 2197-6775. Retrieved 19 March 2020.
  6. School, Stanford Law. "Government by Algorithm: A Review and an Agenda". Stanford Law School. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
  7. Abril, Rubén Rodríguez. "DERECOM. Derecho de la Comunicación. - An approach to the algorithmic legal order and to its civil, trade and financial projection". www.derecom.com (in European Spanish). Retrieved 20 May 2020.
  8. "Rule by Algorithm? Big Data and the Threat of Algocracy". ieet.org. Retrieved 20 May 2020.
  9. Werbach, Kevin (24 September 2018), The Siren Song: Algorithmic Governance By Blockchain, Social Science Research Network, SSRN 3578610.
  10. Williamson, Ben (January 2013). "Decoding identity: Reprogramming pedagogic identities through algorithmic governance". British Educational Research Association Conference. Retrieved 26 December 2020.
  11. Hildebrandt, Mireille (6 August 2018). "Algorithmic regulation and the rule of law". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 376 (2128): 20170355. Bibcode:2018RSPTA.37670355H. doi:10.1098/rsta.2017.0355. PMID 30082301.
  12. Lumineau, Fabrice; Wang, Wenqian; Schilke, Oliver (1 March 2021). "Blockchain Governance—A New Way of Organizing Collaborations?". Organization Science. 32 (2): 500–521. doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1379. ISSN 1047-7039.
  13. Veale, Michael; Brass, Irina (2019). "Administration by Algorithm? Public Management Meets Public Sector Machine Learning". Social Science Research Network. SSRN 3375391.
  14. David Ronfeldt (1991). "Cyberocracy, Cyberspace, and Cyberology:Political Effects of the Information Revolution" (PDF). RAND Corporation. Retrieved 12 Dec 2014.
  15. David Ronfeldt (1992). "Cyberocracy is Coming" (PDF). RAND Corporation. Retrieved 12 Dec 2014.
  16. Ronfeldt, David; Varda, Danielle (1 December 2008), The Prospects for Cyberocracy (Revisited), Social Science Research Network, SSRN 1325809.
  17. "Opinion | Transparency in governance, through cyberocracy". kathmandupost.com. Retrieved 25 April 2020.
  18. Hudson, Alex (28 August 2019). "'Far more than surveillance' is happening and could change how government is run". Metro. Retrieved 25 April 2020.
  19. Cristianini, Nello; Scantamburlo, Teresa (8 October 2019). "On social machines for algorithmic regulation". AI & Society. 35 (3): 645–662. arXiv:1904.13316. Bibcode:2019arXiv190413316C. doi:10.1007/s00146-019-00917-8. ISSN 1435-5655. S2CID 140233845.
  20. "Organisations: Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Kharkevich Institute): Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Kharkevich Institute), Moscow, Russia". www.mathnet.ru. Retrieved 24 March 2021.
  21. "Machine of communism. Why the USSR did not create the Internet". csef.ru (in Russian). Retrieved 21 March 2020.
  22. Kharkevich, Aleksandr Aleksandrovich (1973). Theory of information. The identification of the images. Selected works in three volumes. Volume 3. Information and technology: Moscow: Publishing House "Nauka", 1973. - Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Institute of information transmission problems. pp. 495–508.
  23. Gerovitch, Slava (9 April 2015). "How the Computer Got Its Revenge on the Soviet Union". Nautilus. Retrieved 19 September 2021.
  24. "IU professor analyzes Chile's 'Project Cybersyn'". UI News Room. Archived from the original on 10 September 2009. Retrieved 27 May 2013.
  25. Freeman Engstrom, David; Ho, Daniel E.; Sharkey, Catherine M.; Cuéllar, Mariano-Florentino (2020). "Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies" (PDF).
  26. Margretts, Helen (1999). Information technology in government : Britain and America. New York: Routledge. ISBN 9780203208038.
  27. McCarty, L. Thorne. Reflections on" Taxman: An Experiment in Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning. Harvard Law Review (1977): 837-893.
  28. Stamper, Ronald K. The LEGOL 1 prototype system and language. The Computer Journal 20.2 (1977): 102-108.
  29. Cockshott, W. Paul (1993). Towards a new socialism. Nottingham, England: Spokesman. ISBN 978-0851245454.
  30. Kirby, Michael (1998). "The Future of Courts - Do They Have One". Journal of Law and Information Science. 9: 141. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
  31. Lawrence, Lessig (2006). Code (Version 2.0 ed.). Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-03914-2.
  32. Sodemann, Angela A.; Ross, Matthew P.; Borghetti, Brett J. (November 2012). "A Review of Anomaly Detection in Automated Surveillance". IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews). 42 (6): 1257–1272. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2012.2215319. S2CID 15466712.
  33. Kelty, Christopher (2009). "Explaining IT". Political and Legal Anthropology Review. 32 (1): 156–160. doi:10.1111/j.1555-2934.2009.01035.x. ISSN 1081-6976. JSTOR 24497537. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  34. Danaher, John (September 2016). "The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation". Philosophy & Technology. 29 (3): 245–268. doi:10.1007/s13347-015-0211-1. S2CID 146674621.
  35. Aneesh, A. (2006). Virtual Migration: the Programming of Globalization. Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-3669-3.
  36. O’Reilly, Tim (2013). "Open Data and Algorithmic Regulation". In Goldstein, B.; Dyson, L. (eds.). Beyond Transparency: open Data and the Future of Civic Innovation. San Francisco: Code for America Press. pp. 289–300.
  37. Chavez-Dreyfuss, Gertrude (17 April 2017). "Ukraine launches big blockchain deal with tech firm Bitfury". Reuters. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  38. "Data for Policy 2017". Data for Policy CIC. Retrieved 23 January 2021.
  39. Brauneis, Robert; Goodman, Ellen P. (1 January 2018). "Algorithmic Transparency for the Smart City". Yale Journal of Law & Technology. 20 (1): 103.
  40. Singh, Saurabh; Sharma, Pradip Kumar; Yoon, Byungun; Shojafar, Mohammad; Cho, Gi Hwan; Ra, In-Ho (1 December 2020). "Convergence of blockchain and artificial intelligence in IoT network for the sustainable smart city". Sustainable Cities and Society. 63: 102364. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102364. ISSN 2210-6707. S2CID 225022879. Retrieved 24 March 2021.
  41. Gardner, Allison. "Don't write off government algorithms – responsible AI can produce real benefits". The Conversation. Retrieved 1 April 2021.
  42. "Nevada smart city: A millionaire's plan to create a local government". BBC News. 18 March 2021. Retrieved 24 March 2021.
  43. Beer, Stafford (1975). Platform for change : a message from Stafford Beer. J. Wiley. ISBN 978-0471948407.
  44. "最高法打造"天网"破解执行难 去年615万老赖被"限行"".
  45. ""Skynet" China's massive video surveillance network". Abacus. October 4, 2018. Retrieved 2019-11-13.
  46. "中国天网已建成 2亿摄像头毫秒级寻人". Phoenix New Media Limited (in Simplified Chinese). May 4, 2018.
  47. "How China's Surveillance State Reflects 'Black Mirror'". Fortune. March 27, 2019. Retrieved 2020-01-11.
  48. "How China Is Using Big Data to Create a Social Credit Score". Time. 2019. Retrieved 2020-01-11.
  49. Lakshmanan, Ravie (2019-09-30). "China's new 500-megapixel 'super camera' can instantly recognize you in a crowd". The Next Web. Retrieved 2019-11-13.
  50. "Chinese city with world's heaviest surveillance has 2.5 million cameras". South China Morning Post. 2019-08-19. Retrieved 2019-11-13.
  51. Nicole Kobie (7 June 2019). "The complicated truth about China's social credit system". WIRED UK.
  52. Stevenson, Alexandra; Mozur, Paul (2019-09-22). "China Scores Businesses, and Low Grades Could Be a Trade-War Weapon". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-01-11.
  53. Cheng, Evelyn (2019-09-04). "China is building a 'comprehensive system' for tracking companies' activities, report says". CNBC. Retrieved 2020-01-11.
  54. 不开玩笑！11月1日起，行人闯红灯和这些违法行为将纳入征信体系 (in Chinese). Shenzhen News. Retrieved 2019-11-09.
  55. 7月8日起 在南京一年闯红灯5次以上将记入个人信用记录 (in Chinese). Sina. 2019-07-07. Retrieved 2019-11-09.
  56. Huang, Echo. "Garbage-sorting violators in China now risk being punished with a junk credit rating". Quartz. Retrieved 2019-11-10.
  57. 《上海市生活垃圾管理条例》全文公布 7月1日起施行 (in Chinese). Sina. Retrieved 2019-11-09.
  58. 新《杭州市生活垃圾管理条例》审批通过垃圾不分类乱丢乱扔将被罚款并计入信用档案_省内要闻_平安浙江网. www.pazjw.gov.cn (in Chinese (China)). Retrieved 2019-11-12.
  59. "How China's 'social credit' system blocked millions of people from travelling". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. March 7, 2019.
  60. West, Jack Karsten and Darrell M. (2018-06-18). "China's social credit system spreads to more daily transactions". Brookings. Retrieved 2019-11-13.
  61. 2682万人次因失信被限制乘机. XinhuaNet (in Chinese (China)). Retrieved 2019-11-10.
  62. "Social credit system will not stop people using public services, Beijing says". South China Morning Post. 2019-07-19. Retrieved 2019-11-10.
  63. Ma, Alexandra. "China's controversial social credit system isn't just about punishing people — here's what you can do to get rewards, from special discounts to better hotel rooms". Business Insider. Retrieved 2019-11-12.
  64. Bindra, Jaspreet (30 March 2018). "Transforming India through blockchain". Livemint. Retrieved 31 May 2020.
  65. Finn, Ed (10 April 2017). "Do digital currencies spell the end of capitalism?". The Guardian. Retrieved 31 May 2020.
  66. Reiff, Nathan. "Blockchain Explained". Investopedia. Retrieved 31 May 2020.
  67. Szabo, Nick (1997). "View of Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks | First Monday". firstmonday.org.
  68. Fries, Martin; P. Paal, Boris (2019). Smart Contracts (in German). Mohr Siebeck. ISBN 978-3-16-156911-1. JSTOR j.ctvn96h9r.
  69. "What is DAO - Decentralized Autonomous Organizations". BlockchainHub. Retrieved 31 May 2020.
  70. Prusty, Narayan (27 Apr 2017). Building Blockchain Projects. Birmingham, UK: Packt. p. 9. ISBN 9781787125339.
  71. Chohan, Usman W. (4 December 2017), The Decentralized Autonomous Organization and Governance Issues, Social Science Research Network, SSRN 3082055.
  72. The Gig Economy, Smart Contracts and Disruption of traditional work arrangements
  73. A blockchain-based decentralized system for proper handling of temporary employment contracts
  74. How blockchain technology could change our lives
  75. Business inheritance in blockchain
  76. Blockchain and AI are coming to kill these 4 business verticals
  77. SilentNotary vision
  78. The Bitfury Group and Government of Republic of Georgia Expand Blockchain Pilot
  79. A BLOCKCHAIN - Journals Gateway
  80. Digital Transformation: Blockchain and Land Titles
  81. "Leaked Palantir Doc Reveals Uses, Specific Functions And Key Clients". TechCrunch. Retrieved 22 April 2020.
  82. Winston, Ali (27 February 2018). "Palantir has secretly been using New Orleans to test its predictive policing technology". The Verge. Retrieved 23 April 2020.
  83. Vice Motherboard article on Palantir
  84. The FinCEN AI System: Finding Financial Crimes in a Large Database of Cash Transactions
  85. Commission and Germany’s presidency of the Council of the EU underline importance of the European Health Data Space
  86. Biddle, Sam BiddleMaryam SalehSam; SalehAugust 25 2021, Maryam. "Little-Known Federal Software Can Trigger Revocation of Citizenship". The Intercept. Retrieved 21 September 2021.
  87. "Cuccinelli Announces USCIS' FY 2019 Accomplishments and Efforts to Implement President Trump's Goals | USCIS". www.uscis.gov. 16 October 2019. Retrieved 21 September 2021.
  88. See section on smart contracts; this is possible by means of a digital birth certificate, triggering a smart contract
  89. "Exclusive: Estonia's vision for an 'invisible government'". March 20, 2019.
  90. "Enhancing the use of competitive tendering in Costa Rica's Public Procurement System" (PDF).
  91. E-tender system at UK forestry commission
  92. Government audit software
  93. Audit app: an effective tool for government procurement assurance
  94. Track your driving licence application
  95. Track progress of a reported road fault or issue
  96. "Senate Tracker Help – The Florida Senate". flsenate.gov. Retrieved 2021-01-17.
  97. "Legislative Search Results". congress.gov. Retrieved 2021-01-17.
  98. "GovTrack.us: Tracking the U.S. Congress". govtrack.us. Retrieved 2021-01-17.
  99. Stranieri, Andrew; Zeleznikow, John (2 December 1995). "Levels of reasoning as the basis for a formalisation of argumentation". Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. Association for Computing Machinery: 333–339. doi:10.1145/221270.221608. ISBN 0897918126. S2CID 12179742. Retrieved 5 February 2022.
  100. Sam Corbett-Davies, Emma Pierson, Avi Feller and Sharad Goel (October 17, 2016). "A computer program used for bail and sentencing decisions was labeled biased against blacks. It's actually not that clear". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 1, 2018.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  101. Aaron M. Bornstein (December 21, 2017). "Are Algorithms Building the New Infrastructure of Racism?". Nautilus. No. 55. Retrieved January 2, 2018.
  102. "Beijing Internet Court launches online litigation service center". english.bjinternetcourt.gov.cn. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
  103. "China Now Has AI-Powered Judges". RADII | Culture, Innovation, and Life in today's China. 16 August 2019. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
  104. Fish, Tom (6 December 2019). "AI shock: China unveils 'cyber court' complete with AI judges and verdicts via chat app". Express.co.uk. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
  105. "Can AI Be a Fair Judge in Court? Estonia Thinks So". Wired. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
  106. "ROSS Intelligence Lands Another Law Firm Client." The American Lawyer. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 June 2017. <http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202769384977/ROSS-Intelligence-Lands-Another-Law-Firm-Client>.
  107. CodeX Techindex. Stanford Law School, n.d. Web. 16 June 2017. <https://techindex.law.stanford.edu/>.
  108. Broussard, Meredith (8 September 2020). "Opinion | When Algorithms Give Real Students Imaginary Grades". The New York Times.
  109. "Skewed Grading Algorithms Fuel Backlash Beyond the Classroom". Wired. Retrieved 26 September 2020.
  110. The Machines Are Learning, and So Are the Students
  111. Could artificial intelligence replace our teachers
  112. A professor built an AI teaching assistant for his courses — and it could shape the future of education
  113. The Future of Homeschooling: How Robots are changing in home education
  114. "POLITICS 2028: WHY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WILL REPLACE POLITICIANS b…". SlideShare. 14 July 2018. Retrieved 22 September 2019.
  115. Johnston, Lachlan (12 April 2018). "There's an AI Running for the Mayoral Role of Tama City, Tokyo". OTAQUEST. Retrieved 22 September 2019.
  116. "AI党 | 多摩市議会議員選挙2019". AI党 | 多摩市議会議員選挙2019.
  117. "Werden Bots die besseren Politiker?". Politik & Kommunikation (in German). Retrieved 31 October 2020.
  118. O'Leary, Abigail; Verdon, Anna (April 17, 2018). "Robot to run for mayor in Japan promising 'fairness and balance' for all". mirror.
  119. Sarmah, Harshajit (28 January 2019). "World's First AI-powered Virtual Politician SAM Joins The Electoral Race In New Zealand". Analytics India Magazine. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
  120. "Meet SAM, world's first AI politician that hopes to run for New Zealand election in 2020". Hindustan Times. 26 November 2017. Archived from the original on November 26, 2017. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
  121. "China launches coronavirus 'close contact' app". BBC News. 11 February 2020. Retrieved 7 March 2020.
  122. "China launches coronavirus 'close contact detector' platform". South China Morning Post. February 12, 2020.
  123. "China launches coronavirus 'close contact detector' app". February 11, 2020 – via www.bbc.com.
  124. Chen, Angela. "China's coronavirus app could have unintended consequences". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 7 March 2020.
  125. Mozur, Paul; Zhong, Raymond; Krolik, Aaron (March 2, 2020). "In Coronavirus Fight, China Gives Citizens a Color Code, With Red Flags" – via NYTimes.com.
  126. "Coronavirus France: Cameras to monitor masks and social distancing". May 4, 2020 – via www.bbc.com.
  127. Manancourt, Vincent (10 March 2020). "Coronavirus tests Europe's resolve on privacy". POLITICO. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
  128. Business, Ivan Watson and Sophie Jeong, CNN. "Coronavirus mobile apps are surging in popularity in South Korea". CNN.
  129. Tidy, Joe (17 March 2020). "Coronavirus: Israel enables emergency spy powers". BBC News. Retrieved 18 March 2020.
  130. Paksoy, Yunus. "German telecom giant shares private data with government amid privacy fears". trtworld. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
  131. "Moscow deploys facial recognition technology for coronavirus quarantine". Reuters. 21 February 2020. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
  132. "Italians scolded for flouting lockdown as death toll nears 3,000". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
  133. "Palantir provides COVID-19 tracking software to CDC and NHS, pitches European health agencies". TechCrunch. Retrieved 22 April 2020.
  134. "Japanese team develops AI-based system to forecast tsunami and damages". www.preventionweb.net.
  135. "Artificially Intelligent Tsunami Early Warning System".
  136. "How Artificial Intelligence Could Help Fight Climate Change-Driven Wildfires and Save Lives". Fortune.
  137. Gómez, Diego; Salvador, Pablo; Sanz, Julia; Casanova, Carlos; Taratiel, Daniel; Casanova, Jose Luis (August 15, 2018). "Machine learning approach to locate desert locust breeding areas based on ESA CCI soil moisture". Journal of Applied Remote Sensing. 12 (3): 036011. Bibcode:2018JARS...12c6011G. doi:10.1117/1.JRS.12.036011. S2CID 52230139.
  138. Sayad, Younes Oulad; Mousannif, Hajar; Al Moatassime, Hassan (March 1, 2019). "Predictive modeling of wildfires: A new dataset and machine learning approach". Fire Safety Journal. 104: 130–146. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.01.006. S2CID 116032143 – via ScienceDirect.
  139. "Artificial intelligence for forest fire prediction".
  140. Business, Article by Rachel Metz, CNN Business Video by John General, CNN. "How AI is helping spot wildfires faster". CNN.
  141. "How AI Is Helping Fight Wildfires Before They Start". Time.
  142. Holley, Peter. "California has 33 million acres of forest. This company is training artificial intelligence to scour it all for wildfire" – via www.washingtonpost.com.
  143. Zhao, Xilei; Lovreglio, Ruggiero; Kuligowski, Erica; Nilsson, Daniel (April 15, 2020). "Using Artificial Intelligence for Safe and Effective Wildfire Evacuations". Fire Technology. 57 (2): 483–485. doi:10.1007/s10694-020-00979-x. S2CID 218801709.
  144. McCormick, Tim. "A brief exchange with Tim O'Reilly about "algorithmic regulation" | Tim McCormick". Retrieved 2 June 2020.
  145. "Why the internet of things could destroy the welfare state". the Guardian. 19 July 2014. Retrieved 2 June 2020.
  146. Eggers, illiam D.; Schatsky, David; Viechnick, Peter. "Demystifying artificial intelligence in government | Deloitte Insights". www2.deloitte.com. Retrieved 4 April 2020.
  147. Mehr, Hila (August 2017). "Artificial Intelligence for Citizen Services and Government" (PDF). ash.harvard.edu. Retrieved 2018-12-31.
  148. Capgemini Consulting (2017). "Unleashing the potential of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector" (PDF). www.capgemini.com. Retrieved 2018-12-31.
  149. Harari, Story by Yuval Noah. "Why Technology Favors Tyranny". The Atlantic. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
  150. "Europe Limits Government by Algorithm. The US, Not So Much". Wired. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
  151. Haag, Rechtbank Den (6 March 2020). "ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2020:1878, Rechtbank Den Haag, C-09-550982-HA ZA 18-388 (English)". uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl (in Dutch). Retrieved 11 April 2020.
  152. Wilkinson, Amber. "'iHuman': IDFA Review". Screen. Retrieved 21 April 2020.
  153. Reuter, Markus (17 August 2020). "Fuck the Algorithm - Jugendproteste in Großbritannien gegen maschinelle Notenvergabe erfolgreich". netzpolitik.org (in German). Retrieved 3 October 2020.
  154. "U.S. Government Is Using an Algorithm to Flag American Citizens for Denaturalization: Report". Gizmodo. Retrieved 21 September 2021.
  155. release, Press. "OASI, the first search engine to find the algorithms that governments and companies use on citizens". Retrieved 16 October 2021.
  156. Heald, David (2006-09-07). Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?. British Academy. doi:10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.003.0002. ISBN 978-0-19-726383-9.
  157. "European Tech Insights (2019) | IE CGC" (PDF). Center for the Governance of Change. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
  158. Spatola, Nicolas; Macdorman, Karl F. (11 July 2021). "Why Real Citizens Would Turn to Artificial Leaders". Digital Government: Research and Practice. 2 (3): 26:1–26:24. doi:10.1145/3447954. ISSN 2691-199X.
  159. Rieger, Frank. "Understanding the Daemon". FAZ.NET (in German). Retrieved 5 April 2020.

Bibliography
  • Code: Version 2.0 (Basic Books, 2006) ISBN 978-0-465-03914-2
  • Yeung, Karen; Lodge, Martin (2019). Algorithmic Regulation. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198838494.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.