Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

MaleficentPi t1_iuazwr3 wrote

That this is very similar to a MidJourneyAI piece I saw?

Nope. Because it is. Similitude does not mean accusation.

−13

bruzly OP t1_iub0r02 wrote

where is the piece? You just throw accusations for my painting that i worked on, based on nothing

4

MaleficentPi t1_iub1ehv wrote

….okay, so the fact you’re flipping out this hard over someone saying that your artwork is very similar to a MidJourneyAI generator result seems a little suspicious overall.

Normal people would have said, “yeah, it has a weird similarity to a lot of art styles” and let it go.

−17

cr1t1cal76 t1_iub5tfd wrote

It’s kind of cowardly to clearly say this isn’t OP’s art, then backpedal and claim OP is getting defensive. You sound like the morons who comment under political posts trying to rile people up, just to claim they’re “only asking questions”.

It’s really easy to reverse image search on google. If OP just copied from some AI prompt that you saw online, it shouldn’t be hard at all to prove that. Otherwise, you’re just being a douchebag by brazenly making a claim you’re clearly not sure of.

14

MaleficentPi t1_iub6bk7 wrote

Didn’t backpedal. Made a statement, then corrected it. This art style is remarkably similar to everything showing up in the AI artwork generation algorithms.

Whether it’s the same artwork I have seen elsewhere or not is not the issue.

It’s me calling out the similarity of this art style to AI generated art sent this thread down a hole.

Probably should not have mentioned that, but the similarities are incredibly striking.

−4

briscill t1_iubeejh wrote

No it’s really not. AI art has more noticeable inconsistencies and looks more uncanny.

5