Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Booblicle t1_ixenubu wrote

I understand that a lot of reddit is about being praise worthy. But to learn, you need critique. And as such it is not meant to be an insult. And at the end of the day if you're satisfied with the photography, that's all that matters.

Tones are ok but I think focus needs to be worked on. It feels as though a proper camera/lens was not used. Oddly, it has grain which wouldn't be bad normally. Here instead, it suggests a lighting/exposure problem. But it could also be a lack of proper digital editing.

Something else, at least to myself make this feel lacking. But I'm unable to place what that thing is precisely particularly without taking a second look. I think maybe the focus point is too centered. Much like a bullseye. Perhaps that was what you was going for though.

I believe there may be too much negative space as well, or at least balanced

33

eyegasm_jpeg OP t1_ixepysg wrote

Thanks! Its very good what you said. the grain here is digital (these are laboratory budget scans, but the noritsu scanner can do better. I scanned the first frame in high resolution on a Nikon - everything is much better there). I have no complaints about the exposure meter. I agree that somewhere the composition, light, focus, depth of field are wrong. but I must say that all 36 frames were improvisation, without preparation and idea.

7

eyegasm_jpeg OP t1_ixeq8k0 wrote

I didn’t wrote: its Fujifilm Superia 400 35mm film

1