Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

20billioncalories t1_iuk7gb9 wrote

Rocket science. It's just that AI requires a shit ton of time and training data.

2

TheManInTheShack t1_iuk7it9 wrote

Rocket Science. If you mean AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) then AGI since it does not yet exist.

1

moistest_bum t1_iuk7iub wrote

Rocket science. AI is just a scam. Look at how pathetic Siri is.

−1

DrRock019 t1_iuk7vec wrote

AI by far. Rocket Science is just Newtonian physics (how much energy you need to move the rocket up). There is some other stuff (aerodynamics, heat stability etc), but once we figured out how to do it, there really is not much room for serious innovation (whereas AI is far from complete)

2

Aggressive_Ninja_789 t1_iuk7vk9 wrote

AI. One day (if it doesn’t already) will be doing the rocket science

1

drawnograph OP t1_iuk7xdf wrote

Replying to moistest_bum (#412,939)

So, I was thinking about how much you'd have to learn to be either - from the ground up, and I was thinking maybe AI but you'd need to know what happens to steel at 2400'c if you're a rocket scientist, but then I watched an ELI35 on Stable Diffusion and I was wtf that's hard too.

1

dal-Helyg t1_iuk801t wrote

AI, once you factor in the quantum aspects.

1

Flaky-Fellatio t1_iukac6p wrote

AI for sure. Rocket science is just the art of calculating trajectories. AI walks boldly into a room that might tear the entire human psyche apart.

1