Zealousideal-Ad4610 t1_j6pia5u wrote
Reply to comment by HavanaPajamaParty in People who are pro life, why? by sia_q
No, they can save your life, but pregnancy in and of itself is not generally lethal also, there is no innocent child at stake so that’s not even close to being a realistic analogy.
Abortion would be more analogous to you choosing to drive after you’ve become drunk with the specific intent to kill somebody because they get on your nerves. And then saying you never consented to getting drunk so even though you made every faulty and stupid decision leading up to that point it isn’t your fault.
HavanaPajamaParty t1_j6pj11q wrote
Then that's still not an apt analogy because the desire to consume alcohol isn't a biological urge.
And I and many others don't believe a fertilized egg is an "innocent child" so you can cut the plea to emotion. That's just your personal beliefs.
Zealousideal-Ad4610 t1_j6pk2v4 wrote
Ironic, why do you think that biological urge exists?
Regardless the initial reason for engaging doesn’t make any difference so long as it was consensual. So uhh, yea you’re wrong. They are both avoidable.
Also, I don’t have to be an idiot along with you or anyone else who wants to cover their eyes and pretend that a human life with potential is not inherently an innocent child. Not a plea to emotion, a recognition of reality.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments