can't be a $60 chainsaw. spent $ 150 on maintenance and the thing works like a dreamSubmitted by mimic751 t3_11ife2i in BuyItForLife
xBluJackets t1_jayeue8 wrote
Reply to comment by Ottomachinen in can't be a $60 chainsaw. spent $ 150 on maintenance and the thing works like a dream by mimic751
Recommend me a Stihl saw for home use. Clearing brush, saplings, and tree limbs. I’d rather have a but too much power than not enough. Thank you!
Ottomachinen t1_jb0v1jl wrote
For the price, the MS170/MS171.
For the ability to hold it with just one hand, the MS193T.
Both are 30cc and will do well for light duty work.
xBluJackets t1_jb10r65 wrote
Thank you
F-21 t1_jb4gwez wrote
For home use, the 260 or 261 is overkill. I think it comes down to the MS251 or MS291 (or MS250 and 290). 45cc or 55cc, 40cm bar or 45cm bar... Should hold both and decide. If you want to fell any serious trees, the MS291 is a far better choice. If you'll cut branches, the 250 is lighter and some 100$ cheaper.
BTW the last number is 0, 1 or 2. It just tells the generation, but in general you can expect about the same performance out of a stihl with the same first two numbers (like, the difference between an MS360 or MS361 or MS362 is negligible, and the 90's predecessor was the Stihl 036 which is also kind of the same). Today, I think the MS171 is a bit more powerful than the 170 but if you can get a better deal for the older version, it's still a great saw...
Sodomeister t1_jb5dh95 wrote
> 260 or 261
Are they overkill if I plan to run it 5-6 hours in a go? Just curious because mine will eventually die and we don't have a Mcculloch dealer anywhere close whereas Stihl is like 2 miles away and the local owners are super nice.
F-21 t1_jb5i8dv wrote
I have a 039 from the 90's, and for some 10 years an MS361. They one "class" larger than the 2XX series. MS361 (or the new 362 - a bit more eco friendly though I think they made it a little heavier) is the most versatile chainsaw on the market, it'll really do everything, you can fell down really large trees or cut off small branches.
Now, I'd not use the 2xx series for large trees but overall they're still very versatile (compared to the 1xx series) nontheless, and a lot lighter.
I can compare my experience with the 039 and the 361. 039 is the farmer model (just like an MS390/391, or the smaller MS290/291), and the 361 is a pro saw. The 361 is more fuel efficient and just a tad lighter. But the ol' 039 is notably more torquey. I think it has some 5cc more. I assume that's even more notable between the smaller chainsaws (261 and 291). At full throttle the 361 is a better saw, but the 039 is really close in performance and I like how it won't stall even at less throttle.
Never had any serious problem with either. The 039 needed a new fuel lines every decade - time makes them rot, but that's to be expected. Never fully rebuilt the 039, but did inspect it ~ 5 years ago and cleaned up the carburetor. It was used a lot, especially in the past. Not daily, but when it was in use, it was a lot of use for 8-10 hours at a time.
If I bought again, I'd probably go for the 391. It's cheaper and totally fine for me. I have 15 hectares of forest. The 361 is really made to cut at least 8 hours, day after day, and be rebuilt countless times. I'd run out of forest in a month.
So, in your case I'd go with the 291. But if you've got some money to spare and want the best, the 261 is lighter and more powerful when you give it the nuts! :)
Sodomeister t1_jb5imsz wrote
Thanks. I appreciate the time spent on your response. We have About a third of that. I don't fell much unless it's a potential danger. Usually just chopping up dead fall after storms to clear trails.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments