Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

mister_skippy t1_iv6asnp wrote

This is definitely not BIFL material. These are overpriced collectible radios that were sold by places like Sharper Image and the like.

Quality of components are average or lower. Performance is, at best, meh.

The only way this is BIFL is if you put it in a box or on a shelf for display and never use it.

216

whichgustavo t1_iv82vwb wrote

Used to sell one at Brookstone when I worked there in HS.

17

Dandan419 t1_iv8md9y wrote

Yeah I have one I got from my uncle when he passed. It’s extremely cheap. The dials all feel like they’re falling apart and it has terrible reception. It does look cool though.

8

MeEvilBob t1_iv969oa wrote

I fixed one for a friend of mine. He said most of the lights didn't work. I opened it up and found that a bunch of the LEDs in the front panel were never even wired up.

It looked like a big steel box but it was actually a thin sheet of aluminum over a particle board box and inside it was a tiny circuit board and nothing else.

7

mister_skippy t1_ivb8cn2 wrote

I did a bit of digging and came up with an internal view of a SOSL radio. And it’s worse than I imagined. Not this exact model, but representative of the build quality of these products.

https://i.imgur.com/HxLsiFI.jpg

2

avalanches t1_iv5vhur wrote

not gonna lie this doesn't look used at all. And it looks kind of cheap actually.

I thought buy it for life wasn't just for old shit.

I thought but for life was for items that had gone through the rigours of use for decades.

this is a 35 year old, New In Box radio. This shouldn't be posted here

MODS

65

Xyspade t1_iv5y7ts wrote

People actually are capable of being careful with an item and treating it nicely in order to keep it pristine over the years, especially if it's something unusual that they care about. But even if it was just taken out of the box yesterday and it works, that's a good sign of its BIFL status. Many electronics that sit dormant for decades don't work because the capacitors and other parts spoil not being used.

I have an SOSL radio as well, different model, it has been in use almost daily for decades, and it looks almost this nice. Admittedly it is built pretty cheaply and has needed DeoxIT several times, but it still works otherwise. So while it may seem cheap, it has lasted this long and what didn't last was easily repirable. Don't judge a book by its cover.

(and by the way this is a manual post approval sub, the mods already saw this)

4

cleverkid t1_iv6e43k wrote

The Grundig Sateliit 800 is the real Buy It For Life Radio.

https://radiojayallen.com/grundig-satellit-800/

Or a Zenith transoceanic

Or the Tivoli, model one:

OP’s radio is like a PT Cruiser.

61

Autriyo t1_ivea2yz wrote

The Tivoli tends to break alot, all in the same way, luckily it's an easy fix. I forgot what exactly it was, I know 2 friends that own them, and they both had the same problem. According to the internet it's not unusual.

2

qtx t1_iv6i27j wrote

Is it really Buy It For Life when the technology (shortwave radio) is obsolete?

−34

Runnin4Scissors t1_iv7kiu2 wrote

Shortwave radio is not obsolete. 🧈🧠

26

PowerandSignal t1_iv7z6rs wrote

What, you haven't heard of the internet yet? All you need are servers, cell towers or landline connections, modems, routers, and computers, tablets or phones and you can communicate instantly all around the world!

So, obviously your little radio set is worthless now. Duh.

/S

6

SkylerBlu9 t1_iv5t6cv wrote

new fallout game looks great

20

zmannz1984 t1_iv5xdkc wrote

I think I recall seeing these for sale in some collectibles catalog at my grandparent’s house around 1990.

16

Candera t1_iv60udh wrote

I think I remember seeing these at Sharper Image/Brookstone in the 90s.

26

KanonBalls t1_iv5qr8d wrote

Ai ai, we used to have one of these.

1

Elmore420 t1_iv6s28h wrote

Lol, I remember when those came out.

1

drewbehm t1_iv5qqyh wrote

Wow that thing is cool

0

RevWaldo t1_iv8b3as wrote

TV broadcasts are no longer analog, so the TV audio no longer works (AFAIK).

Can something still be considered BIFL if it still functions as intended but the current technological ecosystem no longer has a place for it?

0

Fusseldieb t1_iv678h1 wrote

W have a similar one, I might post it here sometime

−1

FatDumbAmerican t1_iv8usc0 wrote

I'd build it it's robot body. Awesomeness

−1

suckitdipwad t1_iv95i83 wrote

I'm not sure why everyone is baggin' on you.

There's likely sentimental value with that radio for you and that's what counts.

Does it work? Probably fine. Just enjoy it :-)

−1

mister_skippy t1_ivb6v5j wrote

People are “baggin’ on” him because this sub is Buy It For Life.

It’s for well-made/quality items that don’t fall apart right after you buy them. For things that are well designed and just work. For things not made of fiberboard and unsoldered connections. Not for crap made from the cheapest possible parts and materials sold at inflated prices to “vintage collectors”.

This radio, and products like it, are why this sub exists. People are tired of cheap things that don’t last. People are tired of things like radios made by “Spirit of St. Louis”. People want quality.

And this radio is the absolute definition of none of these.

Thus… the “baggin’”.

3

suckitdipwad t1_ivij5ti wrote

Looks like it's all of a piece and fully functional to me.

His grandfather had it for life, technically. And it still works and is missing nothing, so it might last this kid's life, too.

Your argument is invalid.

−1

mister_skippy t1_ivijxn3 wrote

But it doesn’t work. OP said that he’d already broken the tuning mechanism and he was planning to “fix it”. He’s going to be quite disappointed when he discovers it’s non-repairable. Take a look at the example image I posted earlier. The tuning mechanism is made of cheap plastic gears. These aren’t user-replaceable, aren’t sold as parts, and are generally so fragile attempting to repair them will cause even more damage.

You’re either irretrievably stupid or you’re arguing for the sake of arguing. Either way, I have no more time for your foolishness.

It’s not BIGFL. Never was. Never will be. Period.

1

suckitdipwad t1_iw1iebo wrote

Guess what, sport? The man can speak for himself, and you're the only fool here.

Congrats.

0

HERMANNATOR85 OP t1_ivabnis wrote

My grandpa was a super meticulous man. He kept everything it great condition. It works great except for the tuner knob broke on the inside so I can’t adjust the station right now, but I’m going to fix it because I’m the one who broke it!

0

MedonSirius t1_iv6k0wh wrote

How heavy is it? I imagine it being very heavy

−2

Kalkaline t1_iv6m4sk wrote

That design is slick

−3

myanroser t1_iv8ku3e wrote

So freakin dope

−3

KY_4_PREZ t1_iv7e24c wrote

😭can we please just go back to designing stuff like this again, instead of all the modern tech with planned obsolescence. This belongs on r/designporn.

−11

YouJustDid t1_iv7m9ht wrote

it’s deceiving — the electronics are as cheaply made as they get; this is just fake “vintage” enclosure design (like Crosley)

4

KY_4_PREZ t1_iv7n8ht wrote

I somehow doubt that a radio from 1985 was designed with the same approach that a fake vintage 2022 JcPenny radio used…

−3

YouJustDid t1_iv7ne4i wrote

that’s your prerogative, fake is fake

2

KY_4_PREZ t1_iv7nost wrote

I’m not arguing with you, my only “prerogative” is simply that electronics were fundamentally designed better in the past.

−2

YouJustDid t1_iv7ootb wrote

The novelty radios they sold at Sharper Image used the cheapest sweatshop-manufactured crap they could get their hands on.

3

KY_4_PREZ t1_iv7poa1 wrote

Again, I’m sure they do, but that has absolutely nothing to do with my point.

0

YouJustDid t1_iv7qntp wrote

has everything to do with your point — the electronics are at best an afterthought

5

KY_4_PREZ t1_iv7r698 wrote

Ok engineering god, please forgive me for my transgression of questioning the legitimacy of cheap modern practices. 🙏

0

YouJustDid t1_iv7tc35 wrote

> questioning the legitimacy of cheap modern practices.

that’s a valid question, with which I agree completely!

…cheap disposability was already well under way by 1985, and the electronics inside the “Spirit of St. Louis” radio are a perfect example

5