Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

icysandstone OP t1_iyselt3 wrote

1

frosty_freeze t1_iysg3ga wrote

Well, I bought both tractors and the snowblower used. I want to say I had 22 or 24 hp tractors? Pretty powerful. Theyโ€™d still chug a little like the one in the video if you really pushed through heavy wet snow. I think bercomac has recommendations for power and that limits the width of the snowblower you can use? BTW, husqvarna and other tractor makers make their own snowblower attachments. But Iโ€™ve never used one and in the spirit of the sub the Berco snowblower was BIFL. Super thick gauge steel. I bought some sheer pins and a spare belt and some transmission oil but it would take a lifetime to break or wear out anything important on it. I was very happy with my Husqvarna tractors too. Pretty sure I sold all for the same amount or more than I paid after years of use!

2

icysandstone OP t1_iyskwcg wrote

Thanks for the info! I will keep this in mind. Canโ€™t beat that depreciation schedule!! :)

1

P3V8S80 t1_iyviuor wrote

I second a garden tractor with attachments. I like the older IH Cub Cadets. The early MTD Cubs (80's-mid 90's) are really good too. Currently have a 1976 Cub Cadet 1450 and love it - it's a tank. Takes about 2 minutes to remove the mower deck. My son and I put the snowthrower on in about 10 minutes. You can get a snow blade for it as well if you just want to plow. You can find a decent one for anywhere between $500-$1000 on FB marketplace. Very simple to work on and it eliminates different machines not being used in the off season taking up space. ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ‘

2

icysandstone OP t1_iyw458g wrote

Thanks! I appreciate your perspective. It sounds like the consensus is the older stuff was made much better!

1