Submitted by jmp3r96 t3_10c7ptt in BuyItForLife
F-21 t1_j4h5czt wrote
Reply to comment by JMAC426 in 1970s Mechanical Timex š Loses a minute a day, but absolutely bulletproof! by jmp3r96
Longines, patek philippe, tag heuer, rolex, citizen, seiko... does not matter, functionally a mechanical watch is obsolete. There is nothing that it could do better. For example, a citizen ecodrive is cheaper, slimmer, more elegant, way more accurate, lighter, more durable and completely maintenance free (I think it uses some sort of capacitors instead of a battery, only needs short term battery anyway, if most battery watches last for 8-10 years on a single battery the ecodrive only needs to last a week or a month so it's really tiny as it is constantly recharged). For more extreme durability, there's g-shock. A mechanical watch is an incredibly complex piece of fragile engineering, quartz is an amazing technology from a functional standpoint. But a mechanical watch is art.
JMAC426 t1_j4h64ik wrote
Just a joke, comrade. Iām well aware of the pros and cons of various watch types. I was just saying Rolex is those things, in comparison to other mechanical watches.
F-21 t1_j4h8hk5 wrote
Rolex is probably the most overhyped since it is so famous :) But probably retains value better? I don't know. I bet lots of people want a Rolex even over some "better" or equivelant brands just cause they only know rolex.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments