Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

jellybean02138 t1_jbb7gmy wrote

Leesteffy "bike lanes are worse than overturning Roe v Wade" Jenkins in shambles

35

ik1nky OP t1_jbaxezq wrote

Good news in my opinion and definitely the correct decision.

30

stannenb t1_jbbn93i wrote

What a waste of taxpayer dollars.

24

niems3 t1_jbebuiq wrote

Fortunately that judge prevented the City from spending a lot more money fighting these idiots

21

bahmutov t1_jbazgxw wrote

Ride on! šŸš“

23

NJS_Stamp t1_jbb2mxx wrote

Kick rocks, Joan.

ā€œStReEtS fOr AlLā€ my ass

21

Lemna24 t1_jbbajbq wrote

So what's the timeline on redoing the bike lanes near Porter Square?

9

vhalros t1_jbbcxqd wrote

The ones right near Porter have already seen some improvements; the segments immediately before and after that should see construction completed by 2026: https://www.cambridgema.gov/Departments/publicworks/cityprojects/2021/massave4massavepartialconstruction

14

itamarst t1_jbbsgrz wrote

In theory the MassAve4 construction might include some improvements to Porter Square too; how much is up to the city, but faster buses are a priority they didn't address in original project and my impression is they want to revisit that. And so maybe that might involve partial reconstruction ala the rest of MassAve4, or not, we'll learn more this year probably.

Separately, if the experiment with concrete barriers goes well on Brattle St, hopefully those will get rolled out across the city.

11

zeratul98 t1_jbc38g2 wrote

You love to see it :D

8

mywifeswayhoterthani t1_jbczu0d wrote

It says one of the plaintiffs' name is Toby Leith....nice try Mr. Tony Keith! We now know your hidden identity, nice try! Country musical genius my ass-i managed to solve that puzzle in a mere 10 minutes!

3

Master_Dogs t1_jbey0fj wrote

Haha, I thought the same thing last time I saw the list of names. Turns out it's just an old white guy with a corporate office job according to Google.

The more interesting names I remember seeing were I think the guy who owns a couple of Dunkins in the Cambridge/Belmont area and I want to say a few other local business owners beyond the standard coo coo for cocoa puffs lady that runs a certain gluten free bakery on Mass Ave. The dunks guy was the funniest, since that Dunks on Mass Ave literally has a private parking lot clearly visible from the street and I highly doubt anyone ever actually had to street park to get their dunkies.

EDIT: ah yes, from this article you can find the list of folks who joined in the lawsuit. Of note were:

  • A guy who ran for City Council on combating climate change of all things (obv it's those people on bikes causing massive amounts of pollution!! not the massive 18 wheelers delivering to fucking dunks or the sea of tail lights driven by suburbanites who didn't want to deal with the red line and shitty bus connections...)
  • Country superstar Toby Keith's evil twin who's a corporate office worker in Cambridge
  • some random names I don't recognize, though maybe one's an attorney in Quincy
  • The guy who owns City Paint on Mass Ave.

Maybe the other lawsuit had the guy who owns some Dunkins in the area; though I def remember seeing a quote from them somewhere and laughing when I looked them up.

EDIT2: oh yeah I forgot there was this second lawsuit with a longer list of names, though it was this article that noted in one of the lawsuits there was an affidavit by the owner of the Dunkins in North Cambridge. The quote from him is hilarious:

> ā€œwhere he attests to a devastating loss of business ā€¦ with the notation that he doesnā€™t think he can survive in business if that bike lane isnā€™t adjusted to permit on street parking,ā€ Zaleznik said. ā€œI donā€™t know the last time I heard of a Dunkinā€™ Donuts in Massachusetts going out of business or threatening to go out of business ā€¦ if they canā€™t make it, I would suggest that almost no business can.ā€

Clearly he forgot he owns a small parking lot that can easily handle the traffic from a handful of people running in for 5 mins to buy a cup of coffee and a dozen donuts for their office breakfast.

8

pattyorland t1_jblf3qa wrote

What's the climate impact of Cambridge's recent bike projects?

It would be an oversimplification to declare without evidence that these projects reduced carbon emissions because they intended to help cyclists. Maybe it's true, but maybe it's not.

Also, the Dunkin at 1007 Mass Ave has no parking lot, and all street parking on both sides of Mass Ave was removed for several blocks.

0

noob_tube03 t1_jbckc8x wrote

I'm a fan of well designed bike lanes (looking at your brattle, all lanes should be like you), but if the law required a safety board to review, and it removed the board and then put in a bunch of shit bike lanes (looking at you garden), then how was the lawsuit dismissed? What is the point of the law if we can just ignore it?

0

ik1nky OP t1_jbclvbj wrote

They never removed the board, they just forgot about it for a few decades. The traffic board would not have any say over a city ordinance anyways, they only have a say on road rules and regulations i.e. parking fines. Furthermore, the new traffic board will only serve as an advisory group, they'll have no direct power.

17

holycow958 t1_jbe98qn wrote

How do you think Brattle is good but Garden is bad? The Garden lanes are transformative

15

noob_tube03 t1_jbfsg3r wrote

The lack of cross road signage makes the bike lanes really dangerous. If you know garden, you know to look at both lanes and in which direction, but if you're not from here you're out of luck. Also doing a split bike lane is a huge waste of infrastructure. Not only does it require twice the plowing and twice the bollards, but it also makes it harder for busses to navigate the road and it makes the road just awful to try to navigate in the winter.

As other threads have mentioned, the garden street bike lane mostly services students too, so why they decided to put one of the bike lanes in a spot to encourage students to ride the wrong way is confusing.

I love the brattle bike lanes because it's much less confusing and much easier to use. The only real downside to brattle imo is you need to pull over into a parking spot to try to cross the street. But that's an issue with any bike lane. I'm curious why people think brattle is bad and garden is good?

4

holycow958 t1_jbi2bci wrote

As someone that commutes daily on Garden and the little bit of Brattle into Harvard Sq., but only rarely goes down the rest of Brattle (the newly done stuff, etc.)...

If there is missing signage, contact Stephen Meuse at the city, he/they are super receptive to small changes like that.

However, I've never had an issue with people on Garden. On the contrary, I regularly have issues of people not looking both ways entering Brattle in dangerous ways. And the bo-directional lanes lead to drivers not understanding and driving and parking in the bike lanes. Just this weekend (rare case for me in this section) saw someone driving down the new section of Brattle bi-directional lane. So from what I have seen, the Brattle style is way more confusing to drivers.

During the public meetings, someone (I think a student) brought up the desire of students from the Radcliff quad to not cross the road to use the inbound lanes. I thought that was a really interesting point and the city looked at it. But bi-direction at Huron would have created chaos and change between 2 lanes and bi-directional is a terrible experience. So I support what they settled on with split lanes the whole way. I do see students going the wrong way frequently enough, but they have always yielded to me, so I don't think it is that bad of a problem.

I think snow clearance of separated bike lanes vs. bi-directional might be a big issue for some cities, but I found Garden to be perfectly fine so far (with the limited winter that it has been). Cambridge does have the right tools and a real plan for separated bike lane plowing, so for us I don't think there's a real difference between the two options.

FWIW, I love the Brattle lanes too, but Garden used to be terrible and I avoided it unless it was late at night and there would be no traffic. Now I use it daily because it is the most direct route for me. I see parents with kids all the time on it. I think that's pretty great and transformative for a quick-build project. And, as mentioned above, I have more problems on the short stretch of Brattle I do regularly than the much longer Garden.

3

noob_tube03 t1_jbj4u6r wrote

Yeah I've seen the cars on Brattle as well. Certainly a design issue; during the rest of the year there needs to be a bollard there to keep cars out, but they also could have done some curb work to make it too small for a car to enter.

I'm surprised the bidirectional was considered bad at Huron but acceptable at Concord. I haven't really figured out the right way to head into the square yet

I know at the first snow I saw the garden lanes got blocked by the plow, but I'm sure it was fixed later. It's more just about needing to clear twice as many lanes. i am always surprised to hear the mix of "I commute" and "it's great to see kids on this". But maybe I'm a grouchy old man who doesnt like ducking wrong way bikers or tots heh

1

holycow958 t1_jbj7jk6 wrote

Young athletic dudes like myself alone don't get better infrastructure. The more kids and parents and older people and etc. riding, the more biking just becomes the best way to get around. So yeah, it's great to see everyone out riding, especially in the winter. And I commute on a bluebike, so even though I go relatively fast with them, it's not like I'm racing for my commute.

2

noob_tube03 t1_jbftj07 wrote

Great example of half assed planning on garden: where garden and Shepard meet there's a cross walk. When it was a 2 way street it didn't matter what side the cross walk was on, but now that it's a one way cars trying to turn onto garden are turning directly into the cross walk, meaning bikes/pedestrians crossing will stop traffic on 2 streets instead of just one. Why didn't the city move the crosswalk? It would be a huge improvement for everyone using the roads, and it would even line up the Shepard bike lane with the crossing. Doesn't take a massive study to see this, and even though we paid for one it was missed. Crazy

1

itamarst t1_jbhksqr wrote

If moving the crosswalk would involve additional construction (e.g. for ramps for people with disabilities) that's out of scope for these projects, since they typically aren't doing construction.

There is one of those streets that will be reconstructed soon, I forget which, though.

In general, if it doesn't involve construction the city will adjust things even after project installation if people make a good enough argument, so email tpt@cambridgema.gov with any suggestions (that's the Traffic, Parking, & Transportation department email). They do read all their email.

5

noob_tube03 t1_jbhnloq wrote

So removing all the parking, changing a street from 2 way to 1 way, and installing bollards is considered in scope, but not killing cyclists from cross traffic or looking at cyclist/pedestrian impact isn't in scope? You know that sounds weird right?

0

itamarst t1_jbj2f84 wrote

The city is not doing construction: no curb changes, no pouring concrete. Only paint or flexposts. If moving a sidewalk requires construction they won't do it as part of the project.

Within those constraints, they are trying to make the street safer for cyclists and pedestrians. I think the project is very nice. Many others do. You may disagree, or think there are ways to improve; if so the solution is to share suggestions with the city, not complain on reddit.

4

noob_tube03 t1_jbj4ge6 wrote

iirc the design that had garnered the most public support wasnt the one the was deployed, so I'm not going to hold my breath reaching out to the city. Nor should I need to for the items I mentioned. Like I said, it feels half assed. I didn't realize they were constrained from making physical changes with the project however, so that certainly explains it

1

holycow958 t1_jbi2vsz wrote

This project being a quick-build, the city didn't do any curb modifications. The curb-cuts are where the crosswalk markings are and not on the other side, so they can't just change the markings. But I'd still recommend emailing the city/Stephen Meuse/DPW about that so that they could try to do that small construction project separately.

2