noob_tube03 t1_ith0b42 wrote
Reply to comment by CJYP in Email City Council to Abolish Minimum Parking Requirements! City Council is meeting at 5:30pm on Monday, October 24th to discuss making it easier and cheaper to build new housing by eliminating requirement for unneeded parking spaces by Responsible-Bath2778
I trust developers to build less revenue generating property as much as I trust rats to stay out of the trash. I suppose you think developers will create affordable housing all in their own for the good of the residents too
CJYP t1_ith0kh1 wrote
I 100% trust developers to follow the profits. If people want parking, it won't be profitable to build housing without parking, and they will build parking.
IntelligentCicada363 t1_ith3wol wrote
This person has their slice of Cambridge and wants to shut the door behind them. Its that simple.
noob_tube03 t1_itjkwq4 wrote
This other person seems to think people both need parking and increasing the population of Cambridge doesn't require more infrastructure. Which is it, do people need parking or not? Minimum parking requirements mean new development can accommodate parking. If you think people people don't want parking, then how am I "shutting the door behind me"? Especially since I'm the one who wants parking for them?
noob_tube03 t1_ithugkc wrote
Do you have an example of a recent project that required parking, and the building hit occupancy while the parking wasn't utilized?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments