Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

CJYP t1_ith0kh1 wrote

I 100% trust developers to follow the profits. If people want parking, it won't be profitable to build housing without parking, and they will build parking.

4

IntelligentCicada363 t1_ith3wol wrote

This person has their slice of Cambridge and wants to shut the door behind them. Its that simple.

5

noob_tube03 t1_itjkwq4 wrote

This other person seems to think people both need parking and increasing the population of Cambridge doesn't require more infrastructure. Which is it, do people need parking or not? Minimum parking requirements mean new development can accommodate parking. If you think people people don't want parking, then how am I "shutting the door behind me"? Especially since I'm the one who wants parking for them?

0

noob_tube03 t1_ithugkc wrote

Do you have an example of a recent project that required parking, and the building hit occupancy while the parking wasn't utilized?

1