Submitted by SpyCats t3_11aybnf in CambridgeMA
nattarbox t1_j9ve01e wrote
Reply to comment by ErkMcGurk in Is this AirBnB situation allowed under Cambridge rules? by SpyCats
>the operator must live in a unit adjacent to the STR unit as a primary residence and own all the other units
This is the hangup here, the owner in this case is not living on the property. Cambridge added this part to prevent people from buying up housing to use as short term rental investments.
ErkMcGurk t1_j9ve97l wrote
Mmm, fair enough. I'd guessed that the "manager" may be considered "operator", but neglected to consider the ownership part in that line.
SpyCats OP t1_j9vng0g wrote
Right, this is where it felt unclear. The operator in this case may be the manager/tenant. So possibly legal (but still lame).
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments