Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Badgercakes7 t1_je2ay8t wrote

Reply to comment by timmahfast in Spotted in New Milford by British_Rover

Given that the conservative crowd has spent the last several years painting the entirety of the LGBTQ crowd as pedophiles/groomers, ya I’d say that’s problematic.

Not to mention I can’t possibly see how allowing people to murder others without due process could possibly have negative consequences. Nope, never heard of the Salem witch trials.

33

timmahfast t1_je2c90s wrote

I supposed it depends who this person would consider a pedophile. I don't associate LGBTQ with pedophiles. Maybe this person does. We wouldn't know without having a conversation with them.

−23

Badgercakes7 t1_je2hlh8 wrote

Or you know, don’t call for the extrajudicial murder of any group no matter what? Let our legal system do it’s job?

19

jtherese t1_je2uk9y wrote

I understand this sentiment but whatever side of the political spectrum you are on sexual predators of every kind are grossly under-sentenced even in very public cases. I don’t support the extrajudicial murder of almost anyone - but that opinion has nothing to do with believing that our legal system will deliver them to justice and I would never encourage someone else to believe that either.

−6

Badgercakes7 t1_je2x1us wrote

Do you have any stats to back up what you are saying, because “grossly under sentenced” is a pretty vague statement.

Regardless though, your alternative is, rather than change the laws to create stricter sentencing for sexual assault, is to empower random people to murder people in the streets, without a trial by jury?

4

jtherese t1_je2xci9 wrote

Bro literally read my comment. I said I do not condone “the extrajudicial murder of almost anyone”. Also have you ever watched the news ever in your life? Or known someone who has been sexually assaulted? Give me a fucking break. Do a simple Google search if you can actually read.

−3

Badgercakes7 t1_je2yw4k wrote

Ya that “almost” is doing some REAL heavy lifting in that sentence.

And let’s say you’re right, that sexual assault is under sentenced. Fine. What is your plan? Because you are commenting here in support of someone with a “pedophile Hunter” sticker.

Do a simple google search yourself on how often vigilante / mob violence targets innocent people, often members of marginalized groups. Research the Salem witch trials. Hell, research Germany in the late 30s. Can you really not see why people might be hugely concerned by people claiming all members of the LGBTQ community, not to mention all liberals who support them, are groomers/pedophiles in one breath and calling for the murder of pedophiles in the next?

7

jtherese t1_je34fjt wrote

Again learn how to fucking read. I was replying to your comment and how relying on our corrupt legal system is not a sufficient argument against vigilante justice. You’re literally attacking me for no reason.

−3

Badgercakes7 t1_je36h9c wrote

I never said relying on our legal system is the argument against murdering people in the streets, I’m saying it is the alternative. The argument against murdering people in the streets should be self evident to anyone who is not a violent sociopath.

2