Although the article mentions how Hartford splintered into different municipalities (including West Hartford) in the 1800's, the article mentions the real issue with so many municipalities is in the rural areas of Connecticut, where offices are going vacant because no one is filling low salary positions. . . Which doesn't characterize West Hartford. . .So I guess I would start that arguing from the premise that West Hartford needs to be absorbed because it can't govern itself?

Furthermore, areas that have worked, such as the New Jersey towns mentioned, were of similar size and demographics, and merging was a true merging. I think the extreme argument is that combining Hartford and West Hartford would be akin to gerrymandering, with Hartford's population and priorities overpowering West Hartford's, it would be placing Hartford in charge of West Hartford.

Which, if West Hartford was unable to govern itself, would probably be a reason for West Hartford to be absorbed. But West Hartford and its residents have the resources and the right to prioritize their community. Building Blue Back Square, revitalizing the Prospect Park Plaza area are things West Hartford can handle, and should. Where would these projects rank on a priority list if a part of Hartford? If West Hartford can afford and has the resources to deal with it, why waste Hartford's time and energy on something it doesn't have time for?