Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Ordinary_Guitar_5074 t1_itnxmlo wrote

Reply to comment by pittiedaddy in Renting With Pitbull by weebchildren

That’s dumb. They should have done the opposite. They should ban pit bulls on the state level.

−1

[deleted] t1_itnxsmp wrote

I think pre 2013, towns could make laws banning them.

1

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_itpv9pw wrote

Laws have to have a rational basis to hold up.

1

Ordinary_Guitar_5074 t1_itpxmks wrote

You mean like data and statistics about which breed is involved in the most attacks? About which breed is currently the most abused? About which breed currently occupies shelters in the greatest number? About which breeds have the strongest jaws and which tend to inflict the worst injuries? Because 100% I agree with you that that data supports such a law.

1

Ordinary_Guitar_5074 t1_itpxryq wrote

If you can ban assault rifles you can ban pit bulls. The Constitution doesn’t guarantee your right to a dog.

1

BeadyEyedThieves t1_itpz5zi wrote

4.7 million dog bites in the US annually, 800k requiring medical attention. Dozens of deaths, most of which are from shitbulls. Seems pretty rational to me.

Dogs should be banned outright, they're fucking nuisance creatures, and disgustingly unhygienic. One barking dog ruins an entire neighborhood's right to peace and quiet, and it's practically impossible to find one without some stupid asshole that wants all the positives and none of the responsibility. Fuck every dog owner on earth. Most self absorbed, vapid douchebags to exist.

No, your dog isn't interesting and nothing about it makes you interesting. Your a slave to an ungrateful, nuisance shitbeast that only "likes" you because you feed it. Such a great friend.

0