Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_itnz1j8 wrote

Reply to comment by mattyzucks in Renting With Pitbull by weebchildren

😂😂😂

What? For not wanting the one specific breed around that’s responsible for 2/3 dog killings per year, 30% of which are small children? I have two small kids and there are many breeds of dogs. Pick literally any other one.

I’m not suggesting we euthanize all pits. I’m saying we make it illegal to breed, sell, or purchase them, and require they be neutered as soon as medically safe as puppies. 80% of fatal pit attacks are from un-neutered animals anyways, so it’s an easy win.

9

mattyzucks t1_itnzpj7 wrote

It's psychotic anti-pit propaganda like this which makes people think they're inherently vicious or scary. They're not.

−10

[deleted] t1_ito0ab7 wrote

Anti-pit propaganda? I’m literally quoting statistics from the CDC website 😂 You might want to look in the mirror before throwing around words like psychotic and propaganda when someone literally just quotes data.

10

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_itq07yd wrote

Wrongly quoting them. You're not including over half of all dogs. And your quoting a tally as evidence of propensity, which it is not.

2

[deleted] t1_itq17pq wrote

False. 50ish dog killings per year, 30-40 from pitts. What makes you say that? What other dogs do I need to include? The bottom 20 breeds are responsible for under 5 attacks per year combined.

The dogs were bred for holding large animals by the throat and then rebred for fighting. Lots of mixing has gone on since then, so some pitts have more or less of the parent DNA from actual fighting dogs, but why take the risk? Plenty of other dog breeds to choose from that don’t kill 10-20 kids per year. If a lab bites my kid and I yell at it, it’ll let go. If a pitt goes after my kid, I’m gonna need 2 minutes of gore and trauma and my sharpest kitchen knife.

0

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_itq4n5v wrote

There's the anti science pure blood bullshit.

That's not how genetics work. ✅

Pitbulls were selectively bred for hunting. ✅

Pitbulls were later bred for loyalty more than for fighting, with only a handful of dogs being trained to fight. ✅

1

shoeshouuu t1_ito0kmb wrote

Yeah. Pits gotta go. You are deranged if you think they aren't dangerous. literally 90% of the dog community agrees

9

[deleted] t1_ito2v3r wrote

Makes sense the dog community agrees. Pits also are responsible for the most fatal attacks on other dogs by far. My colleague had to go to his car, get a screwdriver, and repeatedly stab a pit in the throat and eyes to get it to stop shaking his smaller dog to death.

There’s no other breed that’s going to ignore their owner and a screwdriver being stabbed into their eye to keep trying to kill some random dog at a dog park.

7

shoeshouuu t1_itp80fy wrote

Yeah fuck pit bulls and fuck pitbull owners.

−2

mattyzucks t1_ito0nae wrote

Yeah I 100% don't give a shit

−8

[deleted] t1_ito0v64 wrote

Judging by your personality and how easily you get triggered to rage, I’m thinking you are the exact type of owner that shouldn’t own an aggressive breed. Maybe pits and crazies naturally attract one another?

6

mattyzucks t1_ito0zzk wrote

I'd love for you to meet my dog

1

[deleted] t1_ito28n0 wrote

Thanks for proving my point.

5

mattyzucks t1_ito2d9j wrote

How? He's the sweetest little guy in the world. What point do you think I proved? That doesn't even make any sense. And you teach critical thinking? Oye

2

shoeshouuu t1_ito0qr8 wrote

Sure bud. Don't breed anymore baby killer plz

2

mattyzucks t1_ito0tj1 wrote

Lol baby killer what the fuck? They're not American soldiers dude they're dogs

2

shoeshouuu t1_ito0xit wrote

That have the reputation of killing small children. Stop playing dumb

3