Submitted by weebchildren t3_ycqj2e in Connecticut
pittiedaddy t1_ito1igx wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Renting With Pitbull by weebchildren
What proof? Post the same reposted videos from the hate sub, or "evidence" from dogbites.org?
[deleted] t1_ito25ir wrote
Literally search “fatal dog attacks by year in US”. Click any link. They all say the same thing. The majority of fatal attacks are by pits. The only other breed that holds a candle is Rotts, which I also think should be banned. It goes from 67% of fatal attacks (pits) to like 3% from the next highest breed.
AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_itpum5u wrote
Actually they all say that in the majority of cases the breed is unknown.
[deleted] t1_itpy1rc wrote
False. The data quite clearly shows Pitts are responsible for 60-70% of fatal attacks, even before you count in mixed breeds, which are almost all pitts as well. What source did you draw this conclusion from?
AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_itq45me wrote
I fixed it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments