Submitted by Da_Splurnge t3_ya70za in Connecticut
From the research I've done so far, it seems like there's a fair legal basis for protections provided under PUMA (CT's Palliative Use of Marijuana Act) with at least one solid example of precedent in favor of a card holder whose application was rejected upon the potential employer learning that she had her Card. According to PUMA, so long as the person isn't using cannabis during work hours, their employer has no right to discriminate against them for having/using their MMJ card off the clock.
Still, I'm curious if anyone here has had any difficulty with prospective employers taking issue with someone's status as a card-holder.
To add to that, do people still err on the side of caution by abstaining in advance of a potential request for a drug test during the hiring process?
I have been abstaining for months, but am wondering if that's been unnecessary.
Would appreciate any input people might have (though hoping to avoid some "Mmm drugs are bad, m'kay?" moral circlejerk - trying to keep this productive and nonjudgmental).
Thanks!
Papa_Bearto2 t1_ita0f4q wrote
Have never had any issues getting a job with my medical card. No interviewer has ever asked me if I have the card.
Considering my current boss grows his own weed I can’t imagine it’ll be a problem now either.