Submitted by Da_Splurnge t3_ya70za in Connecticut
From the research I've done so far, it seems like there's a fair legal basis for protections provided under PUMA (CT's Palliative Use of Marijuana Act) with at least one solid example of precedent in favor of a card holder whose application was rejected upon the potential employer learning that she had her Card. According to PUMA, so long as the person isn't using cannabis during work hours, their employer has no right to discriminate against them for having/using their MMJ card off the clock.
Still, I'm curious if anyone here has had any difficulty with prospective employers taking issue with someone's status as a card-holder.
To add to that, do people still err on the side of caution by abstaining in advance of a potential request for a drug test during the hiring process?
I have been abstaining for months, but am wondering if that's been unnecessary.
Would appreciate any input people might have (though hoping to avoid some "Mmm drugs are bad, m'kay?" moral circlejerk - trying to keep this productive and nonjudgmental).
Thanks!
Turbulent_Singer5907 t1_it9khqx wrote
no i’ve never had an issue. you are not allowed to be denied employment for having a medical card but i have seen businesses turn people away for having one, but that is just a reflection of the company and i wouldn’t work for them. when i had to test i just told them i was a card holder and when the test came back with marijuana it didn’t matter. unless you don’t have a card, abstaining isn’t necessary.
however i have been seeing way more that apparently you can’t be denied a job if you smoke weed outside of work, as long as you’re not stoned on the job in connecticut, but idek if that’s even true. (obviously there are some jobs that all this you need to throw out the window and not smoke at all) but i’m not sure how accurate this piece of information is since i have had my card for almost three years, it’s just what i have heard