Submitted by otter_spud t3_ye2buh in Connecticut
ThePermafrost t1_itxc71m wrote
Reply to comment by CoarsePage in How can we incentivize real discussions around solutions to home affordability in CT? by otter_spud
As someone who has toured huge swaths of real estate in these towns, I can safely say they are blighted. There is an absurdly high number of vacant and derelict properties in these towns specifically. They are not towns people generally choose to live in when provided other alternatives.
Sure, there are small nice parts of these towns, but that doesn’t offset the general blight these towns suffer. The median income of Rockville is $25k. Bristol is higher and less blighted (it’s gotten much better the past decade). And Bloomfield is just the suburbs of Hartford, so it’s affected by Hartford’s Blight, though does ok on its own.
CoarsePage t1_itxgvyj wrote
I'm in Bloomfield every day it's not blighted. It's where the headquarters for Cygna are. It's just typical suburban Connecticut. By blighted, do you just mean that poorer people live there.
Where are you getting all these vacant properties from, just looking on Zillow I can count the number of foreclosures for all of these towns on just my two hands. Are you some kind of wannabe slumlord trolling real estate boards and complaining when all there is to buy is slums?
ThePermafrost t1_itxus89 wrote
I’ve invested in a number of these towns and have seen the housing inventory. When you have to literally crawl on your hands and knees to reach the toilet in your apartment.. and that’s the standard for housing in the area, I’d call that a blighted area.
Bloomfield I would consider retracting from the blighted list. It’s not blighted be like those other towns.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments