Ctoffroad t1_iu0c6wk wrote on October 27, 2022 at 4:46 PM

Reply to comment by AdHistorical7107 in how was this POS allowed to walk? by AdHistorical7107

Sorry man but after you throw out the f bomb a few times in such a outrage to my comment I felt I should reexplain my thoughts.

AdHistorical7107 OP t1_iu0cpgh wrote on October 27, 2022 at 4:50 PM

While I should be thankful that this guy was taken into custody, and no one was hurt, I am a bit angered at the possibility this guy can go on a rampage and potentially hurt the victim more.

Legislators did pass Jennifer Law last year. But its not enough in my opinion. And other users have brought up good points (custody battles, he-said/she-said, etc). But any reasonable guy would know not to violate a protective/restraining order. This guy has done it three times, and its concerning.

Ill apologize my vulgarity. I wont apologize for avoiding making this a political statement. You and I both acknowledge a potential flaw. lets address it with our legislators.

Ctoffroad t1_iu0edpo wrote on October 27, 2022 at 5:00 PM

I apprecite the apology thank you. The reality is that it is a political issue right now so yeah where else should we talk about it? And why would we just address only with legislators and not discuss it on a public forum where the current topic is about a criminal that was let lose? Again i urge to do some research as to what is happening right now with the current pro criminal movement and the many procriminal laws that are getting made everyday in progressive areas of the country. This isn't a isolated incident based on laws only with protective/restraining orders. This is a current movement that is very much procriminal view point currently. And i agree lets address it with legislators that if you are for keeping violent criminals locked and against the current progressive movement putting criminals rights over the safety of victims.

AdHistorical7107 OP t1_iu0famq wrote on October 27, 2022 at 5:06 PM

Fine. you got me. politicians make laws. Domestic abuse was addressed with Jennifers law. But why wasn't it addressed here?

Ive done research on it. I have reviewed what they were pushing (shifting from throw them in jail to providing social safety nets). I do agree with aspects of it. But this doesn't apply here. This isn't some dude from Bridgeport who was raised without a father. This is an educated male, who is well off in his $10,000 a month apartment in an affluent neighborhood. This can potentially be a repeat of Jennifer Dulos. It needs to stop.