Submitted by AdHistorical7107 t3_yg1bee in Connecticut
And I know it's not likely, but GOP has been loving to bitch about the executive orders by lamont. God forbid there is a red wave, whose willing to bet stefanowski will attempt to do an executive order limiting abortion....
You republicans will find a way to violate it.
[removed]
Such a big boy lol.
[removed]
That's all you got? What a shame...
True. but it's kind of like Stefadumbski sayng he's going to eliminate 200 taxes but when it is pointed out he can't do that with the legislature approval, he said he do it by executive order and wpuld wait for a lawsuit to stop it.... no different here.
[deleted]
Another political post
[deleted]
If you don’t like your non-preferred party having certain powers you shouldn’t want your preferred party having the those powers.
Republicans don't care about being consistent.
They said Obama golfed too much.
Fucking hypocrite losers.
If you think hypocrisy is reserved only for the right then you aren’t paying close enough attention. Every single one of them, regardless of party, will say ANYTHING to get elected/reelected.
Some "executive" orders can violate why there is legislator.
No matter what party, let the people have a voice and say on any new laws or repealing old ones.
More states (preferably CT cuz y know I live here) really should start embracing referendums.
I doubt it. Also Bob has no chance. Like zero.
So just chill.
Ah yes the infinite possibilities of hypotheticals
Republicans were in the Senate this week calling for Lamont to violate the law by issuing an executive order permitting guns in state forests to, and get this, defend against attacks. Black bears obviously.
Oh no, guns... Oh wait, isn't there something about "arm" somewhere?
Let me see ..gee, I know I heard it from something important
Oh I got it...In the Constitution...the Second Amendment.
And the phrase "shall not be infringed" is in that Amendment.
Therefore, the Republican Senators of the State of Connecticut are asking the Governor of the state to follow the Constitutional law of the United States.
If it went to SCOTUS, the Republicans would win. See rulling on restrictive firearms laws in New York that were unconstitutional.
Oh yea. Forgot your brain and dick so small you need a gun to make yourself feel better
Beats waiting for police to arrive. I will survive while you are dead.
Keep telling yourself that....
I do and sleep knowing I can defend myself and my family. Nothing wrong with that
You can wait for the police. Oh wait. .your party defunded them, so good luck.👍
Meanwhile the adults have to worry about the next school shooting. POS.
Yeah, everything is about some deranged idiot who somehow got their hands on a firearm. Maybe stop the establishment of drugging people with mental issues and find the root cause, lock up firearms from anyone who is unstable.
Next you'll be bitching about the fatalities caused by a car or truck.
Which, by the way are NOT a constitutional right, but a privilege.
I get the sense even a bear would be able to wrestle a gun away from you...
It must be so cool to read a document written 250 years ago with the mentality of a tiny baby who is oblivious to context or depth, without reading significant developments in 250 years of American jurisprudence.
Just as a narrowly tailored time place manner restrictions on government-owned property does not touch or offend the First Amendment, it does not concern the Second either. Not sure if you can understand that over the sound of your childish screeching.
Black bears have been a problem for a while. They're attacking people now. It should not get to the point that one kills a person before something is done. At the very least, please just allow a limited number of hunting tags for them each year. I get it man, bears are ADORABLE, but CT has become a reservoir for them due to lack of predation and their numbers need to be culled.
Blah blah blah.
If anything, we are the problem, having encroached on the bears natural territory.
There was a single bear attack.
Show me the reports signed off by the state biologists saying there are too many bears and that an open season is the only a recommended solution.
I keep seeing people say that the state biologists support this. The ones I have spoken to in person do not. Still waiting to see a report from any state agency saying that this is the correct approach.
I don't think it's too much to ask to approach this from a science-based standpoint, instead of based on our fee fees, blood lust to shoot animals, and unreasonable fear of puppy dog-like black bears.
You're lying. And probably crazy. But definitely stupid.
Uhhh, okay what part do you think I'm lying about? Certainly not the part where you haven't provided an official source saying that a bear season is recommended by science.
You're a whacko and I'm not engaging with you. I edited my comment. Now get bent you psycho.
CT_Patriot t1_iu6gxwk wrote
By the way ....
Abortion rights in Connecticut have been codified into state statute for more than 30 years.