Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_iuiklc9 wrote

OP was saying it should be required.

I think if an employee of any company is relying on state income-based benefits, that amount of the benefits should be added on to the company's tax liability at the end of the year.

2

AskWhyMoreOften t1_iuio6gy wrote

So what does that do for the employee? How does that help the employee to bargain a raise with said company? This persons post isn’t making a lot of sense and seeing their other comments in this post, it’s becoming more and more clear of that.

2

laxmolnar OP t1_iuirzuk wrote

If my post doesn’t make sense. I recommend going back to school as others found it easy to understand.

Transparency allows someone to say “i want a raise” and when many employees say “this is unfair”

We get unions!!!!! Now, how was my thought pointless? Or do you just struggle w thinking?

−1

RunnyDischarge t1_iujb5yx wrote

You can say "I want a raise" without transparency. Transparency isn't going to give an employee, especially an unskilled one, any leverage.

We have unions without transparency.

2

laxmolnar OP t1_iuirqrl wrote

Yo thats an awesome idea!!!

Like brilliant, they pass the puck to the government, government passes it back.

Almost like “we finance this now” and “you pay us back at tax season”

0