Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

SepticYawn t1_isrqsk4 wrote

No she won’t be . A jury found her not guilty on all charges. Nice try

0

HeyFrogMan t1_isrr0qy wrote

That’s why I said “if she lost in court” she would indeed be dead. You ignored that and just said “Well she didn’t, so it all worked out.” You just ignored the hypothetical.

Okay, here’s a case where it didn’t work out. Greg Kelley was convicted on two child sexual assault charges only to be exonerated years later. He should’ve been on death row in your view right?

1

SepticYawn t1_isrrdr3 wrote

People end up on death row sometimes for crimes they didn’t commit. So now we shouldn’t put anyone on death row because they might get exonerated years later. What about Timothy McVeigh tax payers should still be paying for him to live in prison?

1

HeyFrogMan t1_isrrl7r wrote

We spent more in tax dollars for him to be executed and his friend is still alive and being paid by tax payers. Keeping them in a supermax prison in the middle of no where is a good system, because if they turn out to be innocent we can still give them freedom.

1

[deleted] t1_isrrjd2 wrote

[deleted]

1

HeyFrogMan t1_isrrp4m wrote

I didn’t advocate for them to get probation, but execution is extreme. Years in a max or superman supermax prison is a fine solution.

EDIT: autocorrect, I swear I wrote SuperMax

1

[deleted] t1_isrrzjr wrote

[deleted]

1

HeyFrogMan t1_isrs36i wrote

Yeah, sorry I misspelled Super Max, I swear I wrote supermax and it changed to superman.

Have a good night.

1

SepticYawn t1_isrrtye wrote

And as for Greg Kelley he wouldn’t have been put to death as his conviction was overturned a year later.

1

HeyFrogMan t1_isrrvti wrote

So you want a case of sexual assault of multiple children where the defendant was exonerated 10 year laters correct?

1