Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Larrik t1_j0n3iij wrote

because it’s only releasing CO2 that was captured by the tree in the first place. In theory.

Maybe the same amount of CO2 comes out via natural rot vs burning?

7

1Enthusiast t1_j0o6kqi wrote

It’s not even that good. Its actually that a replacement tree can be planted and then absorb the carbon from the burnt tree. Thats a joke, but hey I also read its considered a renewable energy source so im headed to get a few pellet stoves 🥳

1