Submitted by NewsHugh t3_10jfw35 in Connecticut
BobbyRobertson t1_j5n3o0a wrote
Reply to comment by bobupvotes in A Bill Would Require Insurance Companies To Provide Equal Coverage to Dog Owners by NewsHugh
Thanks for the insight!
I understand it doesn't mean it's proof there's no difference between the two situations, but I feel insurance companies should have to show their work to treat people differently. It feels like it'd be too easy for them to overestimate their risk and lock classes of people out of the market. But obviously I'm not in the industry, I'm just skeptical
bobupvotes t1_j5nass3 wrote
Pricing is often a race to the bottom. If you’re pricing someone out, another company will gladly undercut you and make the sale. Fact that all companies are practicing this likely means they have some data supporting a difference between breeds but aren’t comfortable coming out and saying there’s a definitive difference.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments