Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

FxTree-CR2 t1_j5u6n3h wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Lamont proposes allowing CT pharmacists to prescribe birth control by gabbydeben

Yeah…. Nah. Nobody is adding more to their plates. They have the training to be able to properly administer BC. It’s an option to start writing them. If someone is overwhelmed, they won’t.

I strongly recommend you take a step back and see what this actually is before responding again.

Did you even read the article?

3

iwanttobehappy2022 t1_j5u9a05 wrote

Yeah I did. I’m talking how cvs and Walgreens staff their pharmacies, they’re usually understaffed as is. It’s just allowing pharmacists to write scripts for birth control pills. I’m saying people should be an established patient with a pcp doctor at the least to mitigate rare but possible side effects or complications. But if this helps I’m for it.

0

FxTree-CR2 t1_j5ua5oq wrote

Nah you didn’t. Have a good one

2

iwanttobehappy2022 t1_j5ujtc8 wrote

I’m very confused. No clue what article you read but what was proposed is letting pharmacists write scripts for birth control pills. There is a provision in the bill that allows aprns and pa’s to preform suction abortions. APRN’s and PA’s are not pharmacists. They don’t work behind the counters at the pharmacy. It had nothing to do with my comment about how cvs and Walgreens understaffing their pharmacies. Nor did I say I was against abortion or against increasing access to birth control. I just said it would be better to increase women’s access and privacy to primary care doctors instead having the busy pharmacist write scripts because it would reduce chances of very rare but possible side effects.

0

FxTree-CR2 t1_j5ut5zl wrote

Lmao yeah, you really have no clue what you’re talking about here but I see that you think you do, while being too arrogant to look up a VERY COMMON convention of the lawmaking process…

So again, have a good day.

1