Submitted by Prudent-Ball2698 t3_11eksd4 in Connecticut
[removed]
Comments
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaelvl8 wrote
If we set the trend as a state, NY follows then mass, NJ, the east coast, then the south then the west and Midwest. As a human we should keep them off the streets to better our society, especially our home state.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaem3vm wrote
Idk if you've looked on a registry, you should. The amount of sex offenders on your block or near you would probably surprise you, then look into their crimes you'd be surprised that they got off ao easy or not airholed inside
CTrandomdude t1_jaeyqtz wrote
Maybe it is so surprising because they are just everyday folks living their lives and not bothering anyone. If they actually were that dangerous you would be hearing more.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaf0820 wrote
ANYONE who sexually assaults anyone is a danger. More then a person who does a mob hit or a robbery a drug deal anything really. Noone who does a sex crime deserves to see the light of day, and should be put in Gen pop. Let the boys inside sort it out
CTrandomdude t1_jaf1ycm wrote
Anyone who commits any crime of violence is potentially a danger. It needs to be addressed and that person rehabilitated just like any other crime. There are many crimes classified as sex crimes that have zero violence. The classic fear of the stranger abduction/rape is actually the most rare sex crime. For those people I do favor stiff prison sentences.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaf2f0w wrote
I was a victim or it 2x that's why I'm very much against them seeing light of day. One was my step mother. So as a man, I just cannot stand it
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaeqpg9 wrote
Everyone who down votes is probably a sex offender,or a pedo
Walmart_Prices t1_jaer8lk wrote
Quick everyone give him the karma . Upvote upvote lmao š¤£
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaexko4 wrote
Man all these down votes but I didn't say anything that's inaccurate. Almost like people don't wanna have sex offenders get what they deserve. How many probably are sex offenders? I'd guess 1/3
SaddenedBKSticks t1_jaenoik wrote
I mean, drug dealers have the potential to ruin not only people's lives/families, but also neighborhoods, and well, murderers literally take a life away. You're saying anyone of a sex crime should get life compared to them, which isn't reasonable. As with any crime, it depends on the severity, etc. , and it's not always fair, but you don't sound very reasonable. A small offense shouldn't land someone in jail for life.
The law and rulings don't always make sense, and there is room to improve, but I think you're going too aggressively in one direction.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaeqdao wrote
That offense in most cases repeats to the next person thru who it happend to. Sex offenders, and I was inside, for a petty drug offense when weed was illegal, we'd watch pedos get killed second they hit Gen pop. They don't deserve a chance. They ruin people's lives. Sure someone who murders ends one, but which is worse, someone ending a life abruptly, or someone ruining someone else's mentally and spiritually and physically in some cases? With drug dealers, Noone forces anyone to do drugs, Noone says "if you don't take this hit of weed or coke IL kill you" that is personal choice. Murderers should obviously do time but pedophiles you cannot reform. Murderers you can, drug dealers you can reform, sex offenders you really cant
CTrandomdude t1_jaeyds4 wrote
Everything you just said is false. People convicted of sex crimes have the lowest rates of recidivism. It is around 5% based on hundreds of studies. You are just repeating a false narrative that has been debunked decades ago. The most common sex offense is statutory where both parties have a consensual relationship but are off by a few years. The age of consent varies by state as well. So a 16yo and a 25 yo have sex in ct it is not a crime and the 25 yo is not a sex offender. While those same people do that is several other states the 25 yo is subjected to years in prison a be labeled a sex offender. Why do you want that person in prison for life? In a few states if you are arrested for public urination you are labeled a sex offender and put on the registry. You want that guy in prison for life?
There is a huge problem with computer porn addiction where many end up viewing or downloading child pornography. If caught they are considered sex offenders. Should they be locked up for life.
All this while the vast majority 95% are never convicted of any new sex offense. They are reformed like many others.
All this at a cost on average of $50,000 per year per inmate. Society suffers far more when you tie up that amount of tax money when it is not needed.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaezppr wrote
And if one makes thar choice. I'm 26, I'd never do that. I have a conscience. I'd happily pay the tax so they do 25 years to life. I've been through every drug and alcohol and abuse class and talked to people when I was in who ran the classes for those individuals who did sex assaults, the recidivism is actually as high as 90%. I mean besides that being disgusting after saving a child from thar abuse and I did once, I got off, he got 15 years. I'd rather us cutting costs release drug dealers and petty criminals, as long as we curb the sex crimes in our state and country. And if I ever find out you, sexually assaulted someone, then what happens, it happens, between you and me. People like you are why children get scarred for life by rapists and women and even men
CTrandomdude t1_jaf1di4 wrote
Ahh. The trust me I know a guy who told me. Great source for your data. Brilliant.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaf1tiy wrote
Still better then any news source. Not like they lie for their donors
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaeyy0u wrote
Definitely this was written by a chomo. If I catch a 25 year old doing that I'm beating their ass. It's a sex crime if under 18, your more then 3 years older.
CTrandomdude t1_jaf12is wrote
Doubling down on your ignorance again I see. Age of consent in CT is 16 not 18. Plus the name calling.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaf26wu wrote
Within a 3 year range. And fuck yeah, your a chomo if your my age going for a 16 year old, and me and most others will treat tou as such. So a good beating, and a cop looking into it qnd arresting you. As I said do not do that. I don't mind doing time on assault if you fuck a kid. And to go for someone younger, like that, your not even a man, or probably attractive.
CTrandomdude t1_jaf4hnt wrote
For the 3rd time you are 100% wrong. Age of consent in ct is 16. Once 16 you are legal. Pointing this out to you is not an endorsement or approval of a relationship with a 16yo.
AdHistorical7107 t1_jaemlip wrote
What about those who just downloaded a picture.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaeqy3g wrote
If it's a naked kid, hell I'd smack the piss out of you. If it's an adult idc none of my business
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaewyjp wrote
If it's a cute cat tho or a dog or any cute animal, he'll I'd buy you some lunch. Or even if it's your kid, or wife or family, so long as it doesn't cross that boundary, he'll I'd buy you lunch for being a caring guy. If it's pepe the frog, well it better be a good one
One-Awareness-5818 t1_jaenlza wrote
The elementary school next to me is inside a college campus (trade school) and there is a sex offender working in the building. That is wild to me...
Edit: just check now, he is gone
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaerhvm wrote
As he should be. It boggles my mind how people do that. I understand robbery, even murder, business is business, but sex offenders, don't deserve to see the light of day imo, as someone who went through it as a child, if I saw it happening I'd gladly beat the offender halfway to death with a smile knowing I saved a child from decades of mental issues
Connecticut-ModTeam t1_jaf4sjn wrote
Hi, r/Connecticut is focused on Connecticut related items. Your post was removed for not being relevant and specific to Connecticut. Regards, The Moderators
Current-Photo2857 t1_jaeulbd wrote
Murders should be executed, preferably in the way they killed their victim. Drug dealers should be charged as attempted murders, if one of their ācustomersā dies of an OD, the dealerās method of execution should be the same.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaevh13 wrote
If that's the case with drug dealers, would you hold pharmacists in the same way? Thats personal choice, Noone chooses to be sexually assaulted or murdered however, but someone chooses to snort or shoot heroine
Current-Photo2857 t1_jaevmbm wrote
Pharmacist dispense medicine.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaewkhw wrote
Yes but so do drug dealers. They dispense what was legally medicine in the early 1900s and it still is to alot of people, esp cannabis and heroin, pills and everything. What you aren't getting is personal choice. It comes down to personal choice. Noone chooses to be sexually assaulted. And if you keep going on this I'd have to guess your probably a sex offender
Current-Photo2857 t1_jaezoza wrote
Drug dealers make a choice to sell poison, they should be punished for that choice; sex offenders should be punished for their choices too.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaf12nh wrote
So should we use that draconian stance of dealers on users? They choose to buy drugs. I mean if you buy H in the US you know it's got fentanyl, to do a whole bag or 2 in a single snort and die, that's personal choice. Only way around that is legalize and tax drugs. Murderers, if it's an accidental homicide we should lower sentences, if it's intentional keep the sentence the way it is. But sex offenders do deserve 25 to life
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaex9o1 wrote
I mean does the opioid crisis just not register with you? How many Americans that died who were addicted to them from being in legitimate pain then switched to heroin either bc of costs or prescription running out? You've obviously never tried actual drugs and if you did, you'd have a different approach to it then this.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaevbog wrote
Well each case is different. What if your son let's say or daughter, had some drinks at 16 and drove hom, ends up running someone over?
Current-Photo2857 t1_jaevidp wrote
Thatās not murder.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaevmcu wrote
But someone killed someone else
Current-Photo2857 t1_jaevpxi wrote
Thereās a reason the law differentiates between homicide and manslaughter.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaew7jf wrote
It's still a murder. So why shouldn't the law charge that as a murder? Whether intentional or not, or if someone was raping your child, and as any man or woman would do, you beat that owrson to death, it is murder. But ad a person I understand it, and would vote not guilty. But hey to each their own. Sex offenders are always better off doing life away from children and women and everyone really
Current-Photo2857 t1_jaezeoo wrote
And if someone sold your kid heroin and they odāed, Iād bet youād vote ānot guiltyā because that was the kidās choice, right? And I never said sex offenders donāt deserve to be in prison, only that drug dealers and murderers deserve worse.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaf1d0c wrote
Actually I would. Noone forces someone at gunpoint to do a bag, shit I did that stuff in my darkest hours, Noone forced me, nor if I died should they have prosecuted who I git it from. It's personal choice. Just like abortion is.
Prudent-Ball2698 OP t1_jaf1mr7 wrote
Let's face it. Sex offenders should get murder sentence level sentences, and unless your selling and intentionally killing users, you should too as a drug dealer. But as someone who experienced alot inside and out, it'd be better if we didn't incarcerate people who sell a 10 bag that kills someone and they use 8 bags a day themselves
Kolzig33189 t1_jaellm4 wrote
And this has to do with CT how exactly