Submitted by Laurajw12 t3_11attpn in Connecticut
CalligrapherDizzy201 t1_ja5mfn2 wrote
Reply to comment by gewehr44 in Taxing rounds to punish gun owners by Laurajw12
Touché. Fortunately ammunition isn’t a right.
gewehr44 t1_ja6vjmo wrote
I forgot someone else wrote about this:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/02/gun-controllers-have-it-all-figured-out/
The idea that ammunition isn't included is laughable. There are a number of court cases that should be decided this year that will shed some more light on this topic
CalligrapherDizzy201 t1_ja7nind wrote
Why would ammunition be a right? Not mentioned at all. I fear you will be disappointed with the results of those court cases.
gewehr44 t1_ja7phfv wrote
The right to keep and bear arms is not just about guns. It also includes knives & other implements useful for self defense. In Caetano v Massachusetts, stun guns were deemed to be protected by the 2nd. Claiming that the people can own arms but not the means to make them useful is a 'too clever by half' interpretation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caetano_v._Massachusetts?wprov=sfla1
CalligrapherDizzy201 t1_ja7q5q2 wrote
But not ammunition.
gewehr44 t1_jaa14ts wrote
CalligrapherDizzy201 t1_jachjvi wrote
Like I said, but not ammunition. Sigh.
gewehr44 t1_jaa3n5p wrote
This is about carrying ammunition
https://www.ammoland.com/2022/09/heller-wins-against-dc-ammunition-restrictions/
CalligrapherDizzy201 t1_jachrce wrote
Another article full of likely. But no decision.
gewehr44 t1_jadr2x3 wrote
If it's so obvious then, why hasn't any state passed legislation banning ammunition? I don't think it's even been proposed.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments