Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Jacques_Ellul t1_iqs87ns wrote

I linked a historical scholar who goes piece by piece through the creation of the Nazi laws. They openly discussed US race law in the policy discussions. This isn't speculation, we have the documents. Mere doctrinal dismissals have no bearing when the historical record is clear.

It wouldn't make sense if the Nazis didn't study its machinations. They also learned about modern propaganda through studying American and British techniques. None of this should be controversial but all countries without exception don't contain anything that could be called 'history' its mythology and symbol management. It's rather easy to see this when we look at other countries but near impossible to notice operating in daily life precisely because its so familiar.

There's certainly more detailed analysis of the subject that exist than the following but it remains rather insightful.

https://old.reddit.com/r/theoryofpropaganda/comments/xqnzci/racism_has_not_receded_but_actually_progressed_in/

12

Arctlc t1_iqshcq2 wrote

“The US is the most deeply racist society in world history.” There’s no good reason to interject your biased conjecture in the middle of your historical analysis. I was onboard until you decided to write that; it shows a serious lack of knowledge regarding other nations history while simultaneously making you appear entirely amerocentric.

11

Jacques_Ellul t1_iqso1co wrote

Also, the swift backlash against expressing such ideas and the emotional reactions they elicit is at least antidotal evidence in itself. Genuine errors and completely incorrect ideas rarely have the power to even elicit words of correction. If I held a parade proclaiming 2+2=3 it would get no serious consideration, nor deserve none.

3

Jacques_Ellul t1_iqshm19 wrote

That's fair, I removed it. I would maintain that's its accurate nonetheless. If I had taken more time, I'd probably have reworded it as 'the most powerful, systematic, and enduring racist society in world history.' Sentiments don't easily translate into quantifiable research variables and it was sloppy to include them.

I have in mind overt public displays of horror inflicted on individuals in countries outside the US; these are often implicitly regarded as evidence of their power but the opposite is the case. Similar to public execution and torture in European feudalism was always a sign of a weak state. My impression is that you might already be familiar with this line of reasoning but for those who have not, such claims will appear to take off from the planet.

0

[deleted] t1_iqt7963 wrote

[removed]

1

AutoModerator t1_iqt798v wrote

This post has been removed. /r/Documentaries and reddit do not allow Amazon affiliate links to be posted. Please edit or resubmit your post without the "/ref=xx_xx_xxx" part of the URL. Thank you.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

stupendousman t1_iqtml4x wrote

> I linked a historical scholar who goes piece by piece through the creation of the Nazi laws. They openly discussed US race law in the policy discussions.

OK, and does that meant the US laws were the basis of all of their policies? Answer: it doesn't, may have offered some info.

There's enough blame to go around.

0