Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

AndreasBerthou t1_j6uxree wrote

Reply to comment by magiclasso in Coast of Faroe Islands [1080x1080] [OC] IG @andrija_ilic_images by andrija_ilic_images

So eating humans and eating animals is comparable now or? That's a strawman if I've ever seen one.

1

no-kooks t1_j6vf8i7 wrote

Dolphins are smarter than humans, so it is a strawman but in the other direction. Compare for yourself, the cerebral folds don’t lie:

https://thebrain.mcgill.ca/flash/i/i_05/i_05_cr/i_05_cr_her/i_05_cr_her_1a.jpg

0

AndreasBerthou t1_j6vhiyx wrote

And aren't pigs the same intelligence as a toddler? I don't see you saying killing pigs is comparable to slaughtering toddlers.

Humans hunt animals for food.

1

no-kooks t1_j6vklcm wrote

We’re talking about dolphins being of super-human intelligence, and you bring up pigs, granting that they are of sub-human intelligence, and claim parity? You, my friend, could not have devised a more classical example of a strawman if you tried.

“Animal” is an arbitrary, anthropocentric philosophical distinction unless you mean animals in the biological sense, in which case humans are included.

0

AndreasBerthou t1_j6vlwth wrote

I was merely mentioning the fact that pigs are found to be the same intelligence levels as toddlers. So since pigs (and by extention toddlers) are clearly sub-human intelligence, what's the stance on killing them? Your argument was based on intelligence level being the deciding factor in what's allowed to be killed.

The right to kill something isn't determined by the hunter's or the hunted's brain development, it's something decided by humans (as morbid as it is).

1

no-kooks t1_j6vnt37 wrote

Actually, my argument was merely that you were correct in your declaration of “strawman” with regard to killing humans and killing dolphins being comparable, but in the opposite direction. All this other stuff like “stance” and “right” and “allowed” and “morbid” is projection coming entirely from you. I would venture perhaps you have a guilty conscience.

0

magiclasso t1_j6vq7ib wrote

You presented hunting for food as an absolute defense. Not a strawman at all. Maybe try to expand on your incredibly shallow thinking.

0