Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Carbon140 t1_jdqac5m wrote

That isn't correct under capitalism. Under capitalism someone can own land/resources and contribute zero Labor and still take profits from it. On a simple scale Imagine a farm or property owner who employs a manager to manage the entire property and just sits on his butt all day.

Under capitalism its very clear no matter how efficient production gets ownership of resources/land will make sure we don't live in some post scarcity utopia.

11

Surur t1_jdqben3 wrote

Well, except that labour makes new resources accessible. Such as installing solar panels or mining astroids.

2