Submitted by ImArchBoo t3_1263vb4 in Futurology
SomeoneSomewhere1984 t1_je7hfxd wrote
The difference between this and other historical technological advances is that this is meant to do everything humans can do better and cheaper than humans, not just some things.
lemonsqueeze84 t1_jeatlnf wrote
What if the robots want paid?
ImArchBoo OP t1_je7ie5y wrote
It can’t do everything humans can or always cheaper, that’s just not true. It’s not creative, it can’t act as a security guard and it’s very far away from being able to better decide many societal problems compared to currently functioning bodies of people
It can do some things better, cheaper or even some things humans couldn’t do in the first place. But that’s true for most innovative developments
UnleashingInnovation t1_je9tn1s wrote
I agree, mahines have never shown any ability in regards to creativity and intuition in the innovation process. That will be left to humans working in symbiosis with machines. As it has been since the begining of civiliation.
I think Issacson's book “The Innovators” is fantastic and anyone interested in these discussion should read it.
"One of the key themes of Isaacson’s book is the importance of creativity and intuition in the innovation process. While machines can provide computational power and analytical capabilities, they lack the ability to think creatively and come up with new ideas. Humans, on the other hand, bring a unique perspective and set of skills to the table that is critical for driving innovation forward. According to Isaacson, the most successful innovations arise from the intersection of different skill sets and perspectives, with humans providing the artistic and emotional perspective that drives innovation forward."
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments