Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

NapClub t1_it90tba wrote

Reply to comment by samdutter in A.I.-Generated Art Is Already Transforming Creative Work by Gari_305

There is a kind of art that can be replaced completely by ai and no one will notice or care, and its the most gruling animation related stuff especially.

When i say no one will care. I mean the consumers, the artists out of work will care.

That said all high end art is probably safe but thats a small number of individuals.

19

daveinpublic t1_it9d0kt wrote

I don’t think it will lead to people being out of work. If anything I think Canva will be responsible for that, which isn’t really AI. It’s just well coded to create various combinations of designs without getting photoshop involved.

The AI art will just be one more tool an artist can use. If an artist wants to start from scratch they can. If they want to make 10 digital paintings a day they can use AI as inspiration and the first draft. People will not go out of work, there will just be much more work.

Once again, canva and apps like it are a different story, and take the place of a graphic designer for many companies.

8

Tsuna404 t1_it9ccd8 wrote

I doubt it, those same artist will simply use the AI to improve or speed up their work, just like programmers, so things will likely just stay the same.

0

NapClub t1_it9ej37 wrote

i am sorry but you can't get an ai to bare hand paint for you.

at the top end, people are paying for something that can't be replicated, anything made by ai will always be replicable.

0

myusernamehere1 t1_it9k74n wrote

Lol not yet, but the idea of an AI controlling a paintbrush (think simular to 2 dimensional 3d printing but with a paintbrush/nozel instead) isnt that far out

5

NapClub t1_it9kc23 wrote

again, that would replace working artists but not high end art.

you have to remember what the buyers actually want, and it's not something replicable, it's exclusivity.

1

Green__lightning t1_itmkmyh wrote

As someone who's ran a robotic welder, it would be plenty easy to do hardware wise, teaching painting technique to the software running it sounds like it would take quite a while though.

1

josiphertrace t1_itmf19p wrote

Correct, but you can use it in any number of ways to do other things before and during the painting process

1

NapClub t1_itmgfqo wrote

i mean there are already people who do that and none of them are at the top end, i suppose taste could change tho.

but the rich are very conservative, they change very slowly.

they're still mainly buying the same style that was popular a hundred years ago.

1