Comments
WaitingForNormal t1_iy3sfxg wrote
A lot of people seem to doubt the ability of AI, but I think you are absolutely on to something. As this technology develops there’s no reason any publishing or production company couldn’t start manufacturing “art” around AI “personalities”. Music, movies, art in general has always been a double edged sword, the money people needed the talented people to actually make the product. But the money people would gladly cut the talent out of the picture and reap pure profits without having to share. It will be interesting to see if any new laws are created in response to this, maybe some kind of “source law”, but I’m sure there will be “legal work arounds” as well. The future will definitely be interesting if AI is going to continually absorb and regurgitate “talented works” in any sort of reputable and “respected” way.
StSalvage t1_iy55ygf wrote
>company couldn’t start manufacturing “art” around AI “personalities”.
Happening already
[deleted] t1_iybo6qt wrote
Well damn, the anime Carole & Tuesday shows that happening around 2072 where all music is AI created and no one bothers to write the old fashioned way anymore. Guess we’re early.
StSalvage t1_iyc8g9h wrote
Avatar "influencers" with their own social networking profiles selling fashionable products for their sponsors have been around for quite a while. Whether they incorporate AI so you can have simple conversations with these things I don't know.
Necessary-Celery t1_iy5z9lk wrote
Sounds like a super generic cover of the song... not sure why I expected anything else.
LNate93 t1_iy82z39 wrote
Play all the deep fakes at once in Harmony
AlwaysUpvotesScience t1_iy84gf4 wrote
Holly is not doing its own expression. It requires a song to be input and then it creates its version of the song based on that. You can try it yourself here
Its not that great.
This video was created after painstakingly tuning a filter and AI processing of the original song.
chronicly_retarded t1_iy4243t wrote
This sucks
We already know they wont be labeled as ai songs and people will pass them off as their own just like whats already happening with art.
This is one of the worst directions ai could have gone.
FrmrPresJamesTaylor t1_iy44fum wrote
I know what I really want to hear to add richness and colour to my experience of the world - the dulcet tones of a computer program being instructed by some marketing dweeb
Littlebirdddy t1_iy445v0 wrote
Yeah I don’t like it either
Scitties t1_iy8199t wrote
That's already happening, and I'm afraid a lot of people don't care.
I won't deny that there are a lot of talented artists out there who can give an incredible live performance.
But at the same time there are also a lot of artists with songs that underwent all kinds of digital processing and enhancements, such as autotune. Songs with autotune are still being labeled with the artists name, even if the artist is not able to reproduce the song live.
I see this technology as an evolution of autotune-ish technology. However, I don't know if we should be happy about it...
J_House1999 t1_iy4a8rm wrote
That’s the way the times are going. You can either accept it, because art has always had huge changes in human history, or you can be a boomer about it. The former sounds way more fun, so I’m gonna do that.
jonny_wonny t1_iy7d702 wrote
This is the only direction it could have gone. This is what progress in AI looks like.
Orc_ t1_iy4z49x wrote
> We already know they wont be labeled as ai songs and people will pass them off as their own just like whats already happening with art.
GOOD.
The democratization of art is exploding and eventually it will be automated.
Infinite iterations of artistic pieces, art, music, movies, games.
Most of us are consumers anyway, not artists, we never cared about what's behind the scenes.
TheAlgorithmnLuvsU t1_iycx7fw wrote
Yeah except there's a huge problem. The market is flooded to hell in art across the board. There is already too much going on. AI is only going to exacerbate this. Once someone can generate a full song, pictures, or movies/videos with a few button presses its going to be insane. And realistically, no one is going to give a shit. People already don't give a shit.
Orc_ t1_iydqeex wrote
How is that a problem?
Uvtha- t1_iy4hftn wrote
Hah, the ole sci-fi dystopia is really getting going.
ReverieGoneSpacely t1_iy64o9z wrote
Nobody will know what's going on...even more! Such a happy state of confusion
chibisephy t1_iy448b8 wrote
Anyone got links to ai-generated music that isn't based on existing music?
World_Navel t1_iy751o3 wrote
Reddituser45005 t1_iy5u3zg wrote
I would love to have this to collaborate with. I’m a mediocre musician, a shit singer, and a decent lyricist. I often have a mental idea of what I want a song to be and can build a framework but i lack the talent or the collaborators to create it into a polished piece. I can see this being the perfect addition for any wanna music creator.
FuturologyBot t1_iy3wdwt wrote
The following submission statement was provided by /u/lughnasadh:
Submission Statement
Here's a link to the song.
What's interesting is that it's surprisingly good, as the AI nails using the human voice clone expressively. The song needs a suitable emotional register of heartbreak, and the AI gives it that.
I wonder what this means for the future of the music business? Will the biggest-selling artists still be able to make as much money when their voice has been endlessly cloned for thousands of cover versions? Presumably, we will have a future where every popular song has been covered by thousands, if not millions, of deep-faked voices. When will we reach a point AI deep-faked songs outnumber the human ones?
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/z6yxws/an_aigenerated_cover_version_of_dolly_partons/iy3rbhh/
[deleted] t1_iy413ob wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iy4589y wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iy4z4ml wrote
[removed]
Madock345 t1_iy56j9f wrote
This is so cool. I imagine in a few decades I could listen to any band I want covering any song I want. Mind blowing stuff.
[deleted] t1_iy6ut05 wrote
[removed]
Mash_man710 t1_iy7ls43 wrote
Yes AI will make music but nobody will pay to see a CPU live in concert.
johanknl t1_iy7ooo8 wrote
Have you heard of hatsune miku
Mash_man710 t1_iy7p8v4 wrote
Gladly, no.
Mash_man710 t1_iy7pc10 wrote
And somebody else pointed out that Abba did an avatar concert. I stand humbly corrected and deeply saddened.
take_five t1_iy83dph wrote
Tupac hologram.
StarChild413 t1_iycaon6 wrote
still based off someone existing and for an original hologram to be worth seeing they'd basically have to be a full fake-person
[deleted] t1_iycvfrw wrote
[removed]
OliverSparrow t1_iydrm90 wrote
Don't give up the day job, and - unsolicited advice - do pin down the tentacle coming out of your poorly rendered head.
Cncfan84 t1_iyc4sxu wrote
Meh, it sounds real and it's impressive but it's not great. Missing some emotion in it for me.
[deleted] t1_iy44c6r wrote
I'm no Luddite but this application of AI makes me so sad.
lughnasadh OP t1_iy3rbhh wrote
Submission Statement
Here's a link to the song.
What's interesting is that it's surprisingly good, as the AI nails using the human voice clone expressively. The song needs a suitable emotional register of heartbreak, and the AI gives it that.
I wonder what this means for the future of the music business? Will the biggest-selling artists still be able to make as much money when their voice has been endlessly cloned for thousands of cover versions? Presumably, we will have a future where every popular song has been covered by thousands, if not millions, of deep-faked voices. When will we reach a point AI deep-faked songs outnumber the human ones?