Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

YawnTractor_1756 t1_iv2qhdn wrote

Reply to comment by Graekaris in ‘Carbon timebomb’: climate crisis threatens to destroy Congo peatlands by sector3011

>You're neglecting the fact that science is highly statistical.

Thanks Captain Obvious, you neglectinc the fact there is no statistics in the article, "very close" is not statistics. Of course you gonna say there are some statistics somewhere, and well, duh of course, but they are not here. Not in this article. the article is useless. It's not science at all.

1

Graekaris t1_iv30vmq wrote

No one said they did. But the rate of change is greatly effected, and that's what humanity will struggle with.

1

YawnTractor_1756 t1_iv3nkdg wrote

>the rate of change is greatly effected

You don't know that. It's not verifiable with the information in the article. You just want to believe what you already believe to be The Truth, even when scientific proof is nowhere to be found.

I'm not even asking much. Just give me some freaking numbers: what's the rate, what's the base, I don't even need proofs those numbers are real. But give me something. But there aren't anything. Yet "activists" still upvote "because science". Facepalm.

1