Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Bender-Ender t1_ivzdqj7 wrote

So... As opposed to dumping chemicals on the ground, waiting for them to percolate through and then trying to collect as much as possible of the pregnant chemicals at the bottom of a hill, this process does the same thing but electrifies the ground as well. With reduction in the quantity of chemicals used.

Yep, really green.

Edit: Hmmm... The only other comment that isn't deleted is one praising the tech and how important it is for China and the environment. Seems like some good ol' fashion all-genuine-non-state-influenced redditting going on here.

−24

DarthMeow504 t1_ivzqtzq wrote

I'd call an 80% reduction in the amount of chemicals used a pretty darned significant improvement all by itself, not even counting the other benefits.

33

Bender-Ender t1_ivzuncn wrote

Okay sure, yes it would be. Except the alternative is a 100% reduction in chemicals poured into the ground like the way it's done everywhere except China. First you dig it up to isolate it from the environment then you process it.

−15