Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

kolitics t1_iwxf9ie wrote

Reply to comment by JaggedMetalOs in Meta has withdrawn its Galactica AI, only 3 days after its release, following intense criticism. Meta’s misstep—and its hubris—show once again that Big Tech has a blind spot about the severe limitations of large language models in AI. by lughnasadh

Perhaps the real test was whether they would be identifiable as fake.

51

HumanSeeing t1_iwyn6tu wrote

Or.. perhaps.. the real test was the friends we made along the way!

21

gbot1234 t1_ix00g4o wrote

I even found a significant other (p<0.05)!

1

stage_directions t1_iwz7o73 wrote

Yes, they would, when people tried to reproduce or build upon the science and shit didn’t work. That’s how science works.

3

juxtoppose t1_ix0otqu wrote

That’s the way it should work but published papers is no guarantee of accuracy. In fact that’s wrong it IS the way science works but scientists are people and people are corrupt and often wrong. AI just as likely to be wrong, so far...

2

stage_directions t1_ix0pp34 wrote

I’m a scientist. Depending on the field, it’s not that hard to tell.

1