Looking at your profile, you're either a moron or a troll. If you're a troll though, I'd say you're a moron anyways, but perhaps I'm the fool for replying.

> absolutely nothing has changed in computer programming ever

"It has gotten more sophisticated" , for one. "Nothing has changed" is simply wrong. Lots has changed. you very quickly disregard the absolutely incredible achievements in CS and mathematics that lead you to advancements you use every single day. breakthroughs in machine learning like developing "deep learning" algorithms have done incredible things.

> Nothing the program does is outside what is expected.

Yeah no shit, cuz they made it to do that they wanted to do, and it did what they wanted to do, which is what they expected.

> Its as complicated as 3 lines of code in basic.

This is simply ignorant and wrong.

> We didnt use Al to describe space invaders

Because space invaders is not AI. Nor is it machine learning. Space invaders is an "algorithm" in the sense that it's instructions. It tells our little aliens to move back and forth and shoot and that if the x coordinate is lined up with the enemy to do this and if the y coordinate is lined up with the edge of the screen to do that. AI is synthesis, AI is generative. An AI space invaders would be as such: don't give the "characters" any instructions at all. Don't give them rules like "oh if you are lined up with the enemy, shoot". Simply let the machine try random shit. And tell the machine what random shit led to higher or lower scores for the player. And the machine finds itself a strategy which leads to lower scores for the player.

> or at all as long as have lived until recently when every headline involving Computer programming uses the term Al now. its called clickbait. I am well aware that people have changed the meaning of Al to incorporate any computer program but its a very poor way of describing a computer program.

Y'know what, I'll give it to you that people use AI as a buzzword clickbait bullshit thing sometimes. But have you ever considered that the reason we have only recently heard of AI is because major breakthroughs have only recently started to come to consumers? Concepts and theory have been around for decades but we have never, ever, ever had the resources, computational power, intellectual resources, and wealth, to apply these ideas to real products for consumers until now.

Also, people have not changed the meaning of AI to incorporate any computer program. If you think AI is some sentient being that's going to take over the world, some sentient being with feelings and genuine consciousness or thought, you are simply wrong. AI and machine learning are not something with a mind of its own. At least not for now and perhaps not ever. If that's what you want AI to be, then there has never ever been AI, and you need to not get your definitions from science fiction.