Submitted by Gari_305 t3_zqst4n in Futurology
guymine123 t1_j10utvg wrote
Reply to comment by Killdren88 in Opportunities and blind spots in the White House’s blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights by Gari_305
Why not? In that case it's essentially an employee, friend, or a family member depending on why its still there.
Are employees not paid?
Do friends not sometimes act as roommates?
Do family members no financially support each other sometimes?
Do you not need to pay for your own food and water to continue living?
[deleted] t1_j112r6n wrote
[deleted]
guymine123 t1_j113uli wrote
How is not being human relevant?
If it is a sapient being then it deserves equal rights.
AwesomeDragon97 t1_j115h3e wrote
So you really think an algorithm deserves rights and should be paid? It’s not like the algorithm could spend the money anyways.
guymine123 t1_j115v2v wrote
If it has a human-level intelligence? Yes.
After all, what is a human but a sapient intelligence that runs on a biological computer?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments