Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j208kij wrote

Reply to comment by crazy_gambit in Some day soon we might be making popcorn with infrared poppers | It's fast, energy efficient, environmentally friendly compared to conventional heating by chrisdh79

[removed]

4

BeeExpert t1_j20dsht wrote

Probably a stove top popper. Definitely produces better popcorn than microwave. It's not that it imparts a special flavor so much as it doesn't require a load of nasty "butter" to cook. I've never had a microwave popcorn that isn't wayyy too greasy (or "buttery").

5

crazy_gambit t1_j20eov4 wrote

It's the same the use in theaters. It's a pot with a stirrer inside. So you add oil (I mostly use coconut oil) that coats the kernels and the sugar. The machine will stir while it cooks so every kernel gets a uniform coating. Cooking with oil vs just microwaving something is significantly different or do we need to debate this?

The final step, which is actually very important, is drying them with the light the machine has. It will heat the bottom of the machine and get the popcorn extra crispy as it comes out slightly wet from the pot.

I got the machine pretty cheap more than a decade ago, but I'm sure they're not hard to find nowadays.

0

CEOofTwitter2 t1_j20gtk9 wrote

You do understand when you microwave a bag of popcorn it has oil and popcorn inside and acts in basically the same manner as your popcorn machine that takes up like 4-8 sq. Ft of space.

1

crazy_gambit t1_j20hz39 wrote

It does not. For one it spreads pretty unevenly, but the way they pop is completely different. I don't think anyone would confuse them in a blind taste.

3

[deleted] t1_j20j4dq wrote

[removed]

0

sleeppyboii t1_j21o2sv wrote

I have made popcorn(n kettle corn) before sadly this dickhead arguing with you about popcorn is Slightly correct but the application of heat really isn't what matters. Also not all popcorn enthusiasts are like this dweeb

2