fungussa OP t1_j6ndd7n wrote
Reply to comment by Remarkable-Way4986 in A dire forecast: Scientists used AI to find planet could cross critical warming threshold sooner than expected by fungussa
Really?? AI is being used to find novel materials in material science to novel medicines and research in physics. We're now also seeing it with AI art and ChatGPT.
Remarkable-Way4986 t1_j6ney29 wrote
Theoretical and unproven from what scientists have already suggested should be out there
fungussa OP t1_j6ni8w8 wrote
Seriously, why are you just making things up??
> AI Designs Quantum Physics Experiments beyond What Any Human Has Conceived - Originally built to speed up calculations, a machine-learning system is now making shocking progress at the frontiers of experimental quantum physics
cvviic t1_j6nfiq4 wrote
It’s finding novel materials By them inputting measurements from every material we currently have. Plus inputs on things we already know. Like phase points, shear strength, all their forces. With out a lot accurate data. The AI could make any guess.
Global warming data is literally all speculative as it hasn’t happened yet. I would suggest you start treating AI like a tool that needs calibration. Some times that tool isn’t/can’t be calibrated for the job
fungussa OP t1_j6nitve wrote
You're just making things up.
> AI Designs Quantum Physics Experiments beyond What Any Human Has Conceived - Originally built to speed up calculations, a machine-learning system is now making shocking progress at the frontiers of experimental quantum physics
> Global warming data is literally all speculative as it hasn’t
What?? Satellites have been measuring less radiation escaping the upper atmosphere then is entering it, and they measuring increased radiation abdorption in the bands in which CO2 absorbs radiation.
There's no point in trying to deny basic physics and chemistry.
cvviic t1_j6o601e wrote
Let me preface this with saying global warming is a thing. My problem is this god like ideologies people are building around AI.
Ok the global warming not having data was a poor use of words on my end. I meant we don’t have data on a runaway green house affect. The physics may state that at “this” specific point we can’t turn it around. The problem is “this” point can’t have real world data. Because we have never seen the world hitting “this” point. The world has to many variables to claim your current measured and mathematically devised outcomes of atomic interactions Covers them all. And with out that hard data to feed into an AI it will make erroneous calculations.
The link you sent only hardens my point of AI using Hard data to make predictions. Idk if you brush up on where we are in quantum physics. But their aren’t to many variables. Yes there is things we don’t understand. But by MEASURING them we know there are mathematically probable out comes depending on only a few variables. It’s all the hard data gathered from places like the LHC that makes AI powerful in this situation. Honestly the only inputs for developing novel materials would be the number of protons, neutrons, electrons, and all of there known forces. With that an AI could easily make new materials.
AI is Amazing at pattern recognition and extrapolates up from the patterns it’s seen in previous data. With out a closed system of all know variables AI can and will make mistakes.
fungussa OP t1_j6o7vbg wrote
Science says that it's not likely that there will be a runaway greenhouse effect, however, the Earth could enter a hot-house state, losing all polar ice with very high sea level rise.
You're not entirely coherent, but I think English is not your first language.
That being said, you don't know much about climate change nor about AI.
Google DeepMind is one of the world's leading AI research labs, and it will be using AI to model weather and climate (it's been one of DeepMind's primary goals, to use AI to understand and find solutions to climate change).
https://analyticsindiamag.com/deepminds-next-project-weather-climate-modelling/
cvviic t1_j6ochuj wrote
Have deep mind give you the temperature and humidity of your county 3 months from know. Then tell me when that time comes if it is 100% accurate. I’m trying to help you see that you are the one who doesn’t understand how AI works.
I definitely lack knowledge on climate change. But I have a pretty firm understanding of AI.
fungussa OP t1_j6odnit wrote
I'm not interested in continuing this conversation.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments