Submitted by thebestmtgplayer t3_104ax4x in Futurology
Hot_Advance3592 t1_j386kqp wrote
Yes there is a bunch of extra rage going on.
But what matters is the core argument: the AI tech takes from artists and repurposes it for profitable gain.
This is a legal issue, and people are passionate to get it figured out. Nothing wrong with that.
Also the problem of, in the context of sharing professional art, individuals are sharing AI art. And people want that to instead be shared elsewhere. That’s also just something to be worked out in the context.
—
There is a lot more noise.
But just as you are trying to make an argument, it’s good to pay mind to what are the core arguments that make sense and exist for a reason.
—
This is in response to a section in the middle of your post that addresses AI art.
thebestmtgplayer OP t1_j390omd wrote
Ah dw about the argument part. I was just sharing my view of things, and how surprised I am by the magnitude of negativity regarding AIart. Maybe it'd turn into a nice discussion or create some positivity for someone out there :D
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments