Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

michalsrb t1_j5yxp2i wrote

Depends on the medium, but human drawing is not that far from finding an image in a noise. If you start with empty paper, then refine it into sketch, then into colored image, then into more detailed image, etc. It's not that far off from refining image out of noise.

With img2img it is like drawing what it "sees", with text2img it's more like drawing something from memory.

Anyway, as I said most of the training data were photographs of the real world, those would still exist without human artists. I guess the pending question is if the AI could then develop some artistic style without inspiration from people.

My guess is that not at first, without non-realistic inputs it would only try to create realistic images. But there would be some distorted images and if any of them look good, they'll end up on the internet. Future AIs will be train on them as well and expand on them... It would eventually evolve into different artistic styles without humans, just take longer to get there. Good we had human artists to kickstart the process.

0

MammothPhilosophy192 t1_j5zm7y9 wrote

> but human drawing is not that far from finding an image in a noise. If you start with empty paper, then refine it into sketch, then into colored image, then into more detailed image, etc. It's not that far off from refining image out of noise.

absolutely not, drawing is translating an idea into paper, it's not discovering what you want in the paper.

> It would eventually evolve into different artistic styles without humans

You were so close.... how many artistic styles do you know of? AI creations will be a style that will coexist with others, it won't replace a thing.

2