Submitted by manual_tranny t3_10a02cq in Futurology
tdacct t1_j44cbyy wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in From 300 GW to 3,000 GW per year – a utopia? by manual_tranny
No amount of over capacity makes the sun shine at night or during a winter storm.
Surur t1_j45dayy wrote
That's why you add wind lol.
tdacct t1_j46kfv2 wrote
I'm sure there's never been a case of no wind at night either. Couldn't possibly happen.
Surur t1_j46lcod wrote
That is why it's "much less storage" and not "no storage".
r2k-in-the-vortex t1_j48ul8f wrote
But if wind already does the job, what do you need solar for?
What is needed is flexible demand to take any and all electricity generated and turn into money. Electricity you can't sell if the least cost efficient of them all, so there is only so far you can go by building overcapacity.
Surur t1_j48vn9p wrote
> But if wind already does the job, what do you need solar for?
Because wind and solar tend to be seasonally complementary.
> What is needed is flexible demand to take any and all electricity generated and turn into money.
I like the idea to turn it into jet fuel - the most difficult area to electrify. Maybe also fuel for cargo ships.
r2k-in-the-vortex t1_j48xfqp wrote
All electric ammonia economy is certainly a contender.
manual_tranny OP t1_j46j4z3 wrote
You should probably never comment on anything, ever again.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments