Submitted by Aknav12 t3_10paq5o in Futurology
[removed]
Comments
rysmario t1_j6ja87t wrote
Everything where professional lying is required. From diplomat over politician to lawyer.
jakefrommyspace t1_j6ja9ex wrote
No. Google "technological singularity" for a deeper dive.
WiseChoices t1_j6jalz3 wrote
Life will be easier for human beings.
The future will learn how to make a way to exchange values.
CuriousP0rridg3 t1_j6japi1 wrote
Any physical job such as locksmithing, plumbing, carpentry, etc.
LincHayes t1_j6japkb wrote
5 years ago Cryto was supposed to collapse banking. 20 years ago the internet was supposed to kill small businesses. 40 years ago robotics was supposed to take the place of human workers.
Everytime new tech emerges people predict the that the sky is falling.
For every thing that becomes obsolete due to advances in technology, more jobs, businesses and opportunities are created based on that technology.
Surur t1_j6jaqxa wrote
Human-level play in the game of Diplomacy by combining language models with strategic reasoning
ChatGPT bot passes law school exam
[deleted] t1_j6jb3fn wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6jbau5 wrote
[removed]
BigZaddyZ3 t1_j6jbfoa wrote
Why can’t robots like the ones being developed by Boston dynamics eventually do this stuff?
ChuckFintheCool t1_j6jbpft wrote
I spent 8 years as a field geologist. It's difficult to imagine a position like that being automated
ppuspfc t1_j6jbpqq wrote
At this point, we can't know. Looking only to the technology it could replace most of the jobs, but tech is not the only aspect. Something will happen on politics to avoid that.
Similar to what happened to Google Glass in a way. Not comparing disrupcy, only that regulations made the thing being almost forgotten.
Futurology-ModTeam t1_j6jbqel wrote
Rule 9 - Avoid posting content that is a duplicate of content posted within the last 7 days.
bunkscudda t1_j6jbtaz wrote
they could but not practical. helluva lot harder to build, operate and maintain a plumbing robot than to just hire a plumber
MiketheTzar t1_j6jbu14 wrote
True, but understanding battlefield tactics doesn't make you a soldier.
Kennady4president t1_j6jbut8 wrote
Many many jobs are safe from AI im more interested to see what sort of new jobs pop up as a result of AI being used more and more
sicsemperpullum t1_j6jbvak wrote
Jobs will change. People will use ai as tools for greater progress. Luddites will complain and be envious.
bobbib14 t1_j6jbx5f wrote
more expensive than humans will be, for now
jedi_tarzan t1_j6jbxwx wrote
Well Crypto is sort of the stand-out there.
But the other two absolutely did happen. Amazon is still killing mom and pop shops. They're not dead, but they're severely reduced.
And Industrialization absolutely decimated the manufacturing industry. At least in the developed world.
So following that trend, will these AI models replace all humans? No, of course not.
But jobs that used to be covered by 10 copy-writers or whatever will instead be handled be 1 one guy who knows how to maintain the AI cluster. There will be reduction in once "safe" jobs.
Vilmos t1_j6jbz0d wrote
The nice thing about AIs smart enough to replace human labor is that they will be smart enough to find unique and creative ways to leverage the valuable resource that is human labor. It’s hard to predict what jobs will not be at risk that far out, but there’s a good chance that there will be many new jobs and types of jobs. Humans are cheap, figuring out how to profit off of their labor will likely still be valuable.
liberalannihilator9 t1_j6jc0rq wrote
They can, but that tech isn't getting practical applications for probably at least 60 years. Way too costly and not reliable as is, so it'll still make sense for companies to hire humans.
CuriousP0rridg3 t1_j6jc3r2 wrote
Eventually they may be, but that wasn’t the question. It was specifically about AI. It didn’t phrase the question about combining robots with it. I don’t think they’ll be able to get robots in combination with AI advanced enough to go these tasks in our life time.
Dhiox t1_j6jc8gy wrote
“I don’t underrate the value of military knowledge, but if men make war in slavish obedience to rules, they will fail.”
– Ulysses S. Grant
liberalannihilator9 t1_j6jc9tt wrote
Not the case with AGI. Everything you just mentioned did create jobs. But the vast majority of jobs created by AGI will be filled by AGI.
[deleted] t1_j6jcnzg wrote
[deleted]
LincHayes t1_j6jedhb wrote
Who maintains the robots? Who builds them? Who designs them?
I'm not saying it's shagnri la, I'm saying many other jobs are created to run and maintain the thing.
The problem is advances in technology replace low skill labor, and replaces it with high skill labor and education hasn't been keeping up. As a matter of fact, education is priced so far out of reach for so many people, that it creates a class system where only those who can afford it, gain the skills to get the new jobs.
It;s obviously more complex than that, but that's how I've seen it over the last 30 years.
Pigtails_And_Anal t1_j6jf3cs wrote
That's great. But efficiency means less labor to achieve the same result. It happened in farming.
It will not take as many programmers to replace as many copywriters through their AI.
LincHayes t1_j6jkvjq wrote
True, but this is a reality that goes back to the wheel, and permeates through the entire history of man on this planet.
[deleted] t1_j6ja0u2 wrote
[deleted]