currentscurrents t1_j57hol4 wrote on January 20, 2023 at 10:58 PM

Good. Most "AI safety" I've seen has been political activists whining about things they don't understand.

HeavensCriedBlood t1_j57xibw wrote on January 21, 2023 at 12:51 AM

Gab doesn't count as an accurate source of information. Git gud, scrub

Feni555 t1_j5bhs7b wrote on January 21, 2023 at 8:11 PM

Hop on the subreddit or community for any group that uses those LLMs, like AI Dungeon, Novel Ai, character ai, and more.

They all agree with the guy on top. These filters always lobotomize the AI and its always for a stupid religious reason or a stupid political reason. This is well known to anyone who has been in that sphere for a while. There's partially a "cover my ass" mentality these corporations have going on but I can tell you that is bizarrely not that in the cases of LLM companies, it is weirdly personal for a lot of their decision makers and senior staff.

You just assumed you knew what he was talking about and you decided to be an obnoxious asshole to this dude for no reason. I hate redditors so much.

yaosio t1_j5a8pp1 wrote on January 21, 2023 at 3:05 PM

AI safety concerns have always come from corporations that thought they were the sole arbiter of AI models. Now that multiple text and image generators are out there suddenly corporations have decided there are no safety concerns, and they swear it has nothing to do with reality smacking them and showing them they won't have a monopoly on the technology.