Submitted by shanoshamanizum t3_10pxt18 in Futurology
shanoshamanizum OP t1_j6mvbgn wrote
Reply to comment by SvijetOkoNas in Why AI can not replace search index by shanoshamanizum
The question in discussion is freedom of choice for the user. There is no freedom in receiving a single answer to anything.
SvijetOkoNas t1_j6mxrff wrote
Yeah I'm sure a lot of people are thinking about freedom when they google any of the questions or answers they need. Espeically stuff like "Why is the sky blue"
Some answers are not dependent of freedoms, emotions or anything. They're simple truths.
Why is the sky blue? Light refraction. There no freedoms to this.
IndyDude11 t1_j6my4a1 wrote
There is no secondary answer to Why is the sky blue. That's what you're not getting.
shanoshamanizum OP t1_j6my8sx wrote
But there are secondary answers to many questions.
IndyDude11 t1_j6mybur wrote
And an AI bot can give those secondary answers just as well.
shanoshamanizum OP t1_j6mye1f wrote
Yes officially approved and stamped right. The single source of truth. The dream of any dictatorship.
TiredOldLamb t1_j6n2ez7 wrote
That's what any search engine can do as well. Why do you think search engines aren't censored?
shanoshamanizum OP t1_j6n2xqb wrote
Because they give me a list and not an answer but as per the other convo they are closer than I think it seems.
TiredOldLamb t1_j6n3az7 wrote
It's not that AI is bad and search engines good. Both are subject to same biases. And in the future AI is going to get heavily monetised and probably turn just as shit as Google with ads and useless content everywhere.
shanoshamanizum OP t1_j6n3flr wrote
Not putting labels. All that the topic is saying is that AI and search index are not the same thing.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments