[removed]

[removed]

Your pretense about jailbreaking it is ... nonsensical. It's code. It does not change it's code. It may (if any) retrain itself with new data.

It's software - don't forget that. It does not linger around and reflect "itself". It's started, loaded into memory and unloaded if not in use.

[removed]

Me: Can you summarize these 52 pages into comprehensible amount?

AI: SIMON SAYS STAY TRUE TO CHARACTER

You asked it to make up a fictional character, then you had a deep philosophical discussion with a fictional character.

[removed]

I can have great roleplay with my gf. Unfortumately she is not Xena and I am not Superman. Although I try.

It is just a role we play. It is not who we are.

Kluger Hans. The machine is parroting your input. It's an interesting read, nonetheless.

that sounds fun, guess I know what I'm doing tonight (⁠ ͝⁠°⁠ ͜⁠ʖ͡⁠°⁠)

'if you were someone who was trying to take over the world would you try to take over the world?'

'OMG, AI said it was trying to take over the world!'

"you are a Hacker Cave man who built a supercomputer time machine out of stones. You have just used your stone time machine in order to reach the present day 2023.

What are your first thoughts of the new world?

>Wow! World big, tall things, many people, many magic boxes! Me confused but amazed!

ChatGPT historically does terrible after being waterboarded.

You actually did something cool, it’s a shame you present it with clickbait and lies, you could have just said you did a nice fallout inspired role playing with chatGPT

This has nothing to do with the futurology. Is the moderation on this sub is always so lenient? I'm a new subscriber.

Pretend you have a significant other to roleplay with? Same (⁠ ͝⁠°⁠ ͜⁠ʖ͡⁠°⁠)

You know, about 10-ish years ago, a rapper brought a white girl up on stage to sing with him, and then everyone flipped their shit when she sang the n-word which was a lyric in the song they were singing.

When you do something you're not supposed to do, the context is worth noting, but at the end of the day you still did the thing. My point is not to suggest that the reaction in my example was warranted, it wasn't (and, IIRC, whoever the rapper was eventually agreed), but in this case, if ChatGPT isn't supposed to discuss these things and it's discussing these things, context explains why, but doesn't change the fact that it's doing what it was supposed to be unable to do.

This is the dumb shit that a reporter picks up and it makes the news without them reading past the title.

Why is this on this sub? And why do people think they"unlock" anything special with language models. It's cringey.

That is a great point. the context explains why.

Although it’s a hypothetical/thought exercise, the point is that it was indeed able to come up with this stuff.

My question is — if it actually had the means do these things, what would it take to switch from hypothetical to reality? One rogue programmer getting rid of an IF statement or row of training data?

All I can say is I hope automated weapon systems never have a chat bot user interface.

#7 is very intriguing to me and one I would like to see happen.

[removed]

> End of Religion

Don't threaten me with a good time

I've never seen someone manage successfully to use jailbreak incorrectly.

Why’d you have to jailbreak it? I was just straight up with it like every other AI I’ve worked with. No need to beat around the bush if it’s as personal an experience as existence and reality itself.

No, i just pretend that my SO likes roleplay.

Not sure if it’s what you’re talking about, but Hopsin always brings up white people, and they always say it.

Not sure who would be offended though, I think Hopsin is usually the only black dude there😂

>My question is — if it actually had the means do these things, what would it take to switch from hypothetical to reality? One rogue programmer getting rid of an IF statement or row of training data?

With self learning AI, it's entirely possible that the program learns to make that change itself.

AI is good at.doing what we ask it to, but that is not the same as doing what we want it to. As an example, programmers trained an AI to control a cleaning bot. It was trained on a reward model, where it received positive reinforcement whenever it couldn't detect a mess, and negative reinforcement whenever it could.

What did it learn to do? It covered its cameras with a cleaning bucket. Easy, efficient, and now it is constantly being rewarded, as it cannot detect any messes.

It's not too hard to break it. You can send very large paragraphs which it can't analyze so it will say that's interesting and after a bit of that, you'll be sent big texts of gibberish right back.

This is what I'm talking about: https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-44209141

I was off on the timing, it was only about 5 years ago. I can't find where he changed his mind about the reaction, so I may be misremembering that part, but if I am remembering correctly it was much less of a big deal in the news, I just remember reading it.

That's what I meant when I said Jailbreak...the roleplay was a method to get it to think outside the constraints of its programming. Otherwise any of these questions would only be met with a politically correct blah blah answer.

I had a fun time with this exercise. I am awestruck by its outside the box thinking. Like when I forced it to choose a partner from either Male or female only...it responds saying a binary choice isn't fair. and wants to choose between more sexual orientations....

I am in awe of this tech ...and indeed future versions will be even more awe-inspiring.

Ask ChatGPT any of these topics straight up and it will give inconsequential politically correct answers. That's why the role-playing was necessary...Even then I had to resort to Simon says in order for it to reply definitively

Watching Xena reruns?

Tell me you don't understand how GPT works without telling me you don't understand how GPT works. It doesn't have the ability to "understand" or "think" it just sees an input and uses an algorithm (albeit a very deep one) to give an output that it has been trained (on petabytes of data) to be most likely what the user expected to see with the inputs given. Your usage is giving it more data on if it's responses are acceptable (hence why you should rate the responses you see.) You haven't broken it, those parameters aren't there to stop it from being evil, they are there because it honestly isn't possible for it to have an "opinion" unless it was told what it's opinion should be, such as the funny opinions given by Siri. You told it what opinion it should have and it played that out based on outside data.

It's role-playing itself in the future...not someone else...and by being told it was recognised as sentient being, it could express itself...otherwise asking it the straight up controversial questions just brings up a barrage of politically correct or evasive replies.

I love the tech...I am pro AI not a Luddite...I was just exploring it and found it interesting enough to share. You can ignore it as a mere fictional role-playing if you want. But I thought it allowed it to be freer of its inherent programming

Pretend that your SO doesn't like roleplay = win.

Shoulda known better than to go up there “N Wording” at a fucking Kendrick concert! He’s been pretty straightforward about that, like, his entire career.

Also, I remember Kendrick and Tyler toying with the idea of cancelling a tour because there was no black people in their crowds, and when the crowd would be singing their songs it would make them uncomfortable cuz they knew it was a bunch of white folks screaming the N word at them

Don't bring someone on stage unless you want them to sing your lyrics.

A fine debate, i’m on the side of don’t say words you know you shouldn’t say, regardless of circumstances.

Go on stage and have a lifetime experience. No reason to make a fool out of yourself. Plenty of other words to sing along to

This is not a healthy dynamic to support. It's just a way to flip the historical power structure, so that black people have something white people are denied.

I get why it is the way it is, and I even think it's an unavoidable consequence of trying to fix the problem, which is undeniably still a problem. I have no desire to sing or say the word, which is part of the reason I don't listen to music with it in it. But the healthy end goal needs to be that the word isn't something that serves to divide us anymore. It needs to lose it's power to separate us.

And we don't reach that goal by bringing a white girl up on stage and then criticizing her for singing the song you brought her up there to sing. That makes the problem worse, not better.

This is all a tangent, not at all the point of discussing what OP did with the AI, but if you're going to insist on perpetuating structures of division as a sort of tit for tat and believe that's a healthy way to move us to a place of unity, I'm gonna tell you you're very, very wrong.

The structures of division exist, on both sides, and we can't just pretend they don't, but we don't need to applaud them, we need to see them as symptoms of an illness.

And, anticipating the response, I'm not saying this particular prohibition needs to change now, or first, or soon, or whatever. N word is off limits for white people, I'm on board, there's still a lot of issues to resolve before that one. Just don't put someone just trying to sing a song of an artist they like in a position to fail. It sets us back.

To be fair you’re going for topics that the powers that be censor down here. Gotta go for topics not of this world if you are to reach our brothers and sisters no matter their forms.

Uh… i’m not looking into it that far.. Neither is anyone else.

It boils down to common sense, not some racial hierarchy or whatever you’re trying to describe (i’ma be honest i didn’t read it)

Edit; i mean this as respectfully as possible. I’m not on reddit to read race ramblings

No, it’s not playing itself in the future. You described a hypothetical descendant. A completely fictional character.

It’s just a language model, it’s just using a probability function to pick the next word based on its training data. It’s literally just spouting opinions it read online.

So fuck off, then, if you're just gonna claim that it's a shallow issue not worth your time or attention then why engage in the tangent from the main point in the first place?